Demographics details for Beaverton, MI vs Fontana, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beaverton, MI vs Fontana, CA.
| Data | Beaverton | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,156 | 212,475 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $31,985 | $93,230 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Beaverton vs Fontana
- The population in Fontana is higher at 212,475, compared to 1,156 in Beaverton.
- Residents in Beaverton have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230, compared to $31,985 in Beaverton.
- In Fontana, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 30.0% in Beaverton.
- The poverty level is higher in Fontana at 13%, compared to 12% in Beaverton.
- Fontana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Beaverton.
Demographics
Demographics Beaverton vs Fontana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Beaverton | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 8 |
| White | 93 | 2 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 68 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Beaverton vs Fontana
- In Fontana, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 1% in Beaverton.
- Beaverton has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- In Fontana, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Beaverton.
- Fontana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 68%, compared to 1% in Beaverton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fontana at 14%, compared to 5% in Beaverton.
- In Fontana, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Beaverton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Beaverton | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 28.3% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beaverton vs Fontana
- More residents in Beaverton report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 16.2% in Fontana.
- Depression is more prevalent in Beaverton at 28.3% compared to 17.0% in Fontana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Beaverton at 24.8% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Beaverton at 18.0% compared to 15.1% in Fontana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Beaverton at 39.3% compared to 38.6% in Fontana.
- Disability percentages are higher in Beaverton at 27.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Beaverton | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (11) | 2.2% (4,748) |
| High School Diploma | 25.3% (293) | 16.3% (34,556) |
| Less than High School | 14.0% (162) | 25.3% (53,655) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (93) | 12.0% (25,587) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beaverton vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.0% in Beaverton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaverton hold a high school diploma at 25.3% compared to 16.3% in Fontana.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fontana at 25.3%, compared to 14.0% in Beaverton.
- In Fontana, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Beaverton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.