Demographics details for Beaverton, MI vs Coleman, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beaverton, MI vs Coleman, OK.
| Data | Beaverton | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,156 | 297 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $31,985 | $45,938 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Beaverton vs Coleman
- In Beaverton, the population is higher at 1,156, compared to 297 in Coleman.
- The median age in Coleman is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 39.6 years in Beaverton.
- Coleman has a higher median income of $45,938, compared to $31,985 in Beaverton.
- In Coleman, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 30.0% in Beaverton.
- The poverty level is identical in both Beaverton and Coleman at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Beaverton is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Coleman.
Demographics
Demographics Beaverton vs Coleman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Beaverton | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 93 | 77 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 11 |
Demographics Comparison: Beaverton vs Coleman
- In Coleman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Beaverton.
- Beaverton has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 77% in Coleman.
- Both Beaverton and Coleman have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Beaverton and Coleman at 1%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coleman at 9%, compared to 5% in Beaverton.
- In Coleman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 11%, compared to 0% in Beaverton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Beaverton | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.4% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 28.3% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 29.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beaverton vs Coleman
- More residents in Beaverton report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 19.9% in Coleman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Beaverton at 28.3% compared to 26.9% in Coleman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Beaverton at 24.8% compared to 22.9% in Coleman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Beaverton at 18.0% compared to 14.8% in Coleman.
- Coleman has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 39.3% in Beaverton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coleman at 29.0% compared to 27.0% in Beaverton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Beaverton | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (11) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 25.3% (293) | 28.6% (85) |
| Less than High School | 14.0% (162) | 4.0% (12) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (93) | 11.1% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beaverton vs Coleman
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaverton have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Coleman.
- In Coleman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.6% compared to 25.3% in Beaverton.
- More residents in Beaverton have less than a high school education at 14.0% compared to 4.0% in Coleman.
- In Coleman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 8.0% in Beaverton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.