Demographics details for Beaverdam, VA vs Santa fe springs, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Beaverdam, VA vs Santa fe springs, CA.

Data Beaverdam Santa fe springs
Population 14,809 18,439
Median Age 45.4 years 38.0 years
Median Income $110,208 $81,500
Married Families 53.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 5% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 5.5

Population Comparison: Beaverdam vs Santa fe springs

  • The population in Santa fe springs is higher at 18,439, compared to 14,809 in Beaverdam.
  • Residents in Beaverdam have a higher median age of 45.4 years compared to 38.0 years in Santa fe springs.
  • Beaverdam has a higher median income of $110,208 compared to $81,500 in Santa fe springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Beaverdam at 53.0% compared to 37.0% in Santa fe springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Santa fe springs at 10%, compared to 5% in Beaverdam.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.0% in Beaverdam.

Demographics

Demographics Beaverdam vs Santa fe springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Beaverdam Santa fe springs
Black 9 4
White 78 -5
Asian 1 8
Hispanic 6 75
Two or More Races 6 15
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Beaverdam vs Santa fe springs

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Beaverdam at 9% compared to 4% in Santa fe springs.
  • Beaverdam has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to -5% in Santa fe springs.
  • In Santa fe springs, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Beaverdam.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 6% in Beaverdam.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Santa fe springs at 15%, compared to 6% in Beaverdam.
  • In Santa fe springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Beaverdam.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Beaverdam Santa fe springs
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 14.9%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 11.7%
Depression Data is updating% 15.1%
Smoking Data is updating% 10.0%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 15.7%
Obesity Data is updating% 30.9%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Beaverdam vs Santa fe springs

  • In Santa fe springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Santa fe springs at 15.1% versus 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher smoking rate at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Santa fe springs at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Santa fe springs has higher obesity rates at 30.9% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Beaverdam and Santa fe springs at 10.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Beaverdam Santa fe springs
No Schooling 1.0% (151) 3.5% (644)
High School Diploma 16.6% (2,455) 16.3% (3,011)
Less than High School 7.5% (1,117) 26.5% (4,883)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 33.8% (5,006) 15.5% (2,850)

Education Levels Comparison: Beaverdam vs Santa fe springs

  • In Santa fe springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 1.0% in Beaverdam.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Beaverdam hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 16.3% in Santa fe springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Santa fe springs at 26.5%, compared to 7.5% in Beaverdam.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Beaverdam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.8% compared to 15.5% in Santa fe springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.