Demographics details for Beaverdam, VA vs Quimby, IA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Beaverdam, VA vs Quimby, IA.

Data Beaverdam Quimby
Population 14,809 244
Median Age 45.4 years 50.4 years
Median Income $110,208 $57,500
Married Families 53.0% 61.0%
Poverty Level 5% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.0 Data is updating

Population Comparison: Beaverdam vs Quimby

  • In Beaverdam, the population is higher at 14,809, compared to 244 in Quimby.
  • The median age in Quimby is higher at 50.4 years, compared to 45.4 years in Beaverdam.
  • Beaverdam has a higher median income of $110,208 compared to $57,500 in Quimby.
  • In Quimby, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 53.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Beaverdam has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Quimby.
  • The unemployment rate in Beaverdam is higher at 3.0%, compared to 0.0% in Quimby.

Demographics

Demographics Beaverdam vs Quimby provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Beaverdam Quimby
Black 9 Data is updating
White 78 76
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 6 24
Two or More Races 6 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Beaverdam vs Quimby

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Beaverdam at 9% compared to 0% in Quimby.
  • Beaverdam has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 76% in Quimby.
  • The Asian population is larger in Beaverdam at 1% compared to 0% in Quimby.
  • Quimby has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 6% in Beaverdam.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Beaverdam at 6% compared to 0% in Quimby.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beaverdam and Quimby at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Beaverdam Quimby
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.6%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 9.6%
Depression Data is updating% 18.9%
Smoking Data is updating% 17.5%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 21.7%
Obesity Data is updating% 41.1%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Beaverdam vs Quimby

  • In Quimby, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Quimby at 18.9% versus 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Quimby has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Quimby at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Quimby has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Quimby at 22.0% compared to 10.0% in Beaverdam.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Beaverdam Quimby
No Schooling 1.0% (151) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.6% (2,455) 41.8% (102)
Less than High School 7.5% (1,117) 30.3% (74)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 33.8% (5,006) 9.8% (24)

Education Levels Comparison: Beaverdam vs Quimby

  • A higher percentage of residents in Beaverdam have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Quimby.
  • In Quimby, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 41.8% compared to 16.6% in Beaverdam.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Quimby at 30.3%, compared to 7.5% in Beaverdam.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Beaverdam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.8% compared to 9.8% in Quimby.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.