Demographics details for Beaver dam, WI vs Waterproof, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beaver dam, WI vs Waterproof, LA.
| Data | Beaver dam | Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,582 | 499 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $65,802 | $21,953 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 9.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Beaver dam vs Waterproof
- In Beaver dam, the population is higher at 16,582, compared to 499 in Waterproof.
- Residents in Beaver dam have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 37.0 years in Waterproof.
- Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802 compared to $21,953 in Waterproof.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Beaver dam at 35.0% compared to 9.0% in Waterproof.
- The poverty level is higher in Waterproof at 30%, compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- Waterproof has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.
Demographics
Demographics Beaver dam vs Waterproof provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Beaver dam | Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 103 |
| White | 81 | -12 |
| Asian | 2 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 8 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Waterproof
- In Waterproof, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 103% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
- Beaver dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to -12% in Waterproof.
- In Waterproof, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 2% in Beaver dam.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Beaver dam at 8% compared to 0% in Waterproof.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Beaver dam at 6% compared to 2% in Waterproof.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beaver dam and Waterproof at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Beaver dam | Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 24.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 20.0% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 25.1% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 33.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.5% | 11.8% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 53.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Waterproof
- In Waterproof, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 24.5% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waterproof at 25.1% versus 23.6% in Beaver dam.
- Waterproof has a higher smoking rate at 33.7% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
- Binge drinking is more common in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 11.8% in Waterproof.
- Waterproof has higher obesity rates at 53.1% compared to 36.6% in Beaver dam.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waterproof at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaver dam.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Beaver dam | Waterproof |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (47) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 23.8% (3,947) | 27.7% (138) |
| Less than High School | 10.3% (1,706) | 10.6% (53) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.2% (3,023) | 12.8% (64) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beaver dam vs Waterproof
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Waterproof.
- In Waterproof, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.7% compared to 23.8% in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waterproof at 10.6%, compared to 10.3% in Beaver dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 12.8% in Waterproof.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.