Demographics details for Beaver dam, WI vs Washington, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Beaver dam, WI vs Washington, IN.

Data Beaver dam Washington
Population 16,582 12,171
Median Age 40.4 years 37.0 years
Median Income $65,802 $48,255
Married Families 35.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 3.2

Population Comparison: Beaver dam vs Washington

  • In Beaver dam, the population is higher at 16,582, compared to 12,171 in Washington.
  • Residents in Beaver dam have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 37.0 years in Washington.
  • Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802 compared to $48,255 in Washington.
  • In Washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
  • The poverty level is higher in Washington at 12%, compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
  • Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.

Demographics

Demographics Beaver dam vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Beaver dam Washington
Black 3 4
White 81 76
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 8 12
Two or More Races 6 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Washington

  • In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
  • Beaver dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 76% in Washington.
  • The Asian population is larger in Beaver dam at 2% compared to 0% in Washington.
  • Washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 8% in Beaver dam.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Washington at 8%, compared to 6% in Beaver dam.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beaver dam and Washington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Beaver dam Washington
Mental Health Not Good 15.7% 18.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.6% 13.5%
Depression 23.6% 27.6%
Smoking 17.6% 23.3%
Binge Drinking 23.5% 16.3%
Obesity 36.6% 36.4%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Washington

  • In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 27.6% versus 23.6% in Beaver dam.
  • Washington has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 16.3% in Washington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Beaver dam at 36.6% compared to 36.4% in Washington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaver dam.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Beaver dam Washington
No Schooling 0.3% (47) 1.3% (163)
High School Diploma 23.8% (3,947) 22.8% (2,771)
Less than High School 10.3% (1,706) 20.2% (2,460)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.2% (3,023) 9.3% (1,129)

Education Levels Comparison: Beaver dam vs Washington

  • In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 22.8% in Washington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 20.2%, compared to 10.3% in Beaver dam.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 9.3% in Washington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.