Demographics details for Beaver dam, WI vs Underwood, ND
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beaver dam, WI vs Underwood, ND.
Data | Beaver dam | Underwood |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,582 | 780 |
Median Age | 40.4 years | 47.3 years |
Median Income | $65,802 | $72,917 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 51.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Beaver dam vs Underwood
- In Beaver dam, the population is higher at 16,582, compared to 780 in Underwood.
- The median age in Underwood is higher at 47.3 years, compared to 40.4 years in Beaver dam.
- Underwood has a higher median income of $72,917, compared to $65,802 in Beaver dam.
- In Underwood, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
- The poverty level is identical in both Beaver dam and Underwood at 0%.
- The unemployment rate in Beaver dam is higher at 3.1%, compared to 2.5% in Underwood.
Demographics
Demographics Beaver dam vs Underwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Beaver dam | Underwood |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 1 |
White | 81 | 87 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 8 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Underwood
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Beaver dam at 3% compared to 1% in Underwood.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Underwood at 87% compared to 81% in Beaver dam.
- In Underwood, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Beaver dam.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Beaver dam at 8% compared to 1% in Underwood.
- Both Beaver dam and Underwood have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- In Underwood, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Beaver dam | Underwood |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 12.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 8.8% |
Depression | 23.6% | 17.5% |
Smoking | 17.6% | 16.1% |
Binge Drinking | 23.5% | 22.7% |
Obesity | 36.6% | 40.0% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Underwood
- More residents in Beaver dam report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 12.8% in Underwood.
- Depression is more prevalent in Beaver dam at 23.6% compared to 17.5% in Underwood.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Beaver dam at 17.6% compared to 16.1% in Underwood.
- Binge drinking is more common in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 22.7% in Underwood.
- Underwood has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 36.6% in Beaver dam.
- Disability percentages are higher in Beaver dam at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Underwood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Beaver dam | Underwood |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (47) | 0.1% (1) |
High School Diploma | 23.8% (3,947) | 19.1% (149) |
Less than High School | 10.3% (1,706) | 8.6% (67) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.2% (3,023) | 13.1% (102) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beaver dam vs Underwood
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.1% in Underwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 19.1% in Underwood.
- More residents in Beaver dam have less than a high school education at 10.3% compared to 8.6% in Underwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 13.1% in Underwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.