Demographics details for Beaver dam, WI vs San gabriel, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Beaver dam, WI vs San gabriel, CA.

Data Beaver dam San gabriel
Population 16,582 38,140
Median Age 40.4 years 44.3 years
Median Income $65,802 $84,056
Married Families 35.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 4.4

Population Comparison: Beaver dam vs San gabriel

  • The population in San gabriel is higher at 38,140, compared to 16,582 in Beaver dam.
  • The median age in San gabriel is higher at 44.3 years, compared to 40.4 years in Beaver dam.
  • San gabriel has a higher median income of $84,056, compared to $65,802 in Beaver dam.
  • In San gabriel, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
  • The poverty level is higher in San gabriel at 9%, compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
  • San gabriel has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.

Demographics

Demographics Beaver dam vs San gabriel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Beaver dam San gabriel
Black 3 1
White 81 2
Asian 2 61
Hispanic 8 27
Two or More Races 6 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Beaver dam vs San gabriel

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Beaver dam at 3% compared to 1% in San gabriel.
  • Beaver dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 2% in San gabriel.
  • In San gabriel, the Asian population stands at 61%, greater than 2% in Beaver dam.
  • San gabriel has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 8% in Beaver dam.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San gabriel at 9%, compared to 6% in Beaver dam.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beaver dam and San gabriel at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Beaver dam San gabriel
Mental Health Not Good 15.7% 13.5%
Physical Health Not Good 10.6% 9.9%
Depression 23.6% 11.9%
Smoking 17.6% 11.0%
Binge Drinking 23.5% 11.2%
Obesity 36.6% 20.4%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Beaver dam vs San gabriel

  • More residents in Beaver dam report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 13.5% in San gabriel.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Beaver dam at 23.6% compared to 11.9% in San gabriel.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Beaver dam at 17.6% compared to 11.0% in San gabriel.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 11.2% in San gabriel.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Beaver dam at 36.6% compared to 20.4% in San gabriel.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Beaver dam at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in San gabriel.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Beaver dam San gabriel
No Schooling 0.3% (47) 7.6% (2,889)
High School Diploma 23.8% (3,947) 16.2% (6,193)
Less than High School 10.3% (1,706) 21.7% (8,295)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.2% (3,023) 26.8% (10,230)

Education Levels Comparison: Beaver dam vs San gabriel

  • In San gabriel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 7.6% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 16.2% in San gabriel.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San gabriel at 21.7%, compared to 10.3% in Beaver dam.
  • In San gabriel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.8% compared to 18.2% in Beaver dam.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.