Demographics details for Beaver dam, WI vs Larchmont, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beaver dam, WI vs Larchmont, NY.
| Data | Beaver dam | Larchmont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,582 | 6,488 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 37.7 years |
| Median Income | $65,802 | $220,714 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Beaver dam vs Larchmont
- In Beaver dam, the population is higher at 16,582, compared to 6,488 in Larchmont.
- Residents in Beaver dam have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 37.7 years in Larchmont.
- Larchmont has a higher median income of $220,714, compared to $65,802 in Beaver dam.
- In Larchmont, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
- The poverty level is identical in both Beaver dam and Larchmont at 0%.
- Larchmont has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.
Demographics
Demographics Beaver dam vs Larchmont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Beaver dam | Larchmont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 81 | 79 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Larchmont
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Beaver dam at 3% compared to 1% in Larchmont.
- Beaver dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 79% in Larchmont.
- In Larchmont, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Beaver dam.
- Larchmont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 8% in Beaver dam.
- Both Beaver dam and Larchmont have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beaver dam and Larchmont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Beaver dam | Larchmont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 10.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 5.7% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 6.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.5% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 22.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Larchmont
- More residents in Beaver dam report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 10.5% in Larchmont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Beaver dam at 23.6% compared to 17.7% in Larchmont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Beaver dam at 17.6% compared to 6.2% in Larchmont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 18.9% in Larchmont.
- Obesity rates are higher in Beaver dam at 36.6% compared to 22.3% in Larchmont.
- Disability percentages are higher in Beaver dam at 11.0% compared to 5.0% in Larchmont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Beaver dam | Larchmont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (47) | 0.0% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 23.8% (3,947) | 4.0% (259) |
| Less than High School | 10.3% (1,706) | 0.7% (46) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.2% (3,023) | 52.9% (3,433) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beaver dam vs Larchmont
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Larchmont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 4.0% in Larchmont.
- More residents in Beaver dam have less than a high school education at 10.3% compared to 0.7% in Larchmont.
- In Larchmont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.9% compared to 18.2% in Beaver dam.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.