Demographics details for Beaver dam, WI vs Jasper, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beaver dam, WI vs Jasper, AL.
| Data | Beaver dam | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,582 | 14,338 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $65,802 | $62,850 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Beaver dam vs Jasper
- In Beaver dam, the population is higher at 16,582, compared to 14,338 in Jasper.
- Residents in Beaver dam have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 35.4 years in Jasper.
- Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802 compared to $62,850 in Jasper.
- In Jasper, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
- The poverty level is higher in Jasper at 15%, compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- Jasper has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.
Demographics
Demographics Beaver dam vs Jasper provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Beaver dam | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 10 |
| White | 81 | 81 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Jasper
- In Jasper, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Beaver dam and Jasper at 81%.
- The Asian population is larger in Beaver dam at 2% compared to 0% in Jasper.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Beaver dam at 8% compared to 5% in Jasper.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Beaver dam at 6% compared to 4% in Jasper.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beaver dam and Jasper at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Beaver dam | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.5% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 38.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Jasper
- In Jasper, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Jasper at 24.0% versus 23.6% in Beaver dam.
- Jasper has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
- Binge drinking is more common in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 15.1% in Jasper.
- Jasper has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 36.6% in Beaver dam.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jasper at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaver dam.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Beaver dam | Jasper |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (47) | 0.5% (69) |
| High School Diploma | 23.8% (3,947) | 14.6% (2,098) |
| Less than High School | 10.3% (1,706) | 12.9% (1,856) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.2% (3,023) | 16.3% (2,338) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beaver dam vs Jasper
- In Jasper, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 14.6% in Jasper.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jasper at 12.9%, compared to 10.3% in Beaver dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 16.3% in Jasper.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.