Demographics details for Beaver dam, WI vs Hawthorne, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beaver dam, WI vs Hawthorne, FL.
Data | Beaver dam | Hawthorne |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,582 | 1,483 |
Median Age | 40.4 years | 38.4 years |
Median Income | $65,802 | $49,479 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Beaver dam vs Hawthorne
- In Beaver dam, the population is higher at 16,582, compared to 1,483 in Hawthorne.
- Residents in Beaver dam have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 38.4 years in Hawthorne.
- Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802 compared to $49,479 in Hawthorne.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Beaver dam and Hawthorne at 35.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Hawthorne at 16%, compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- Hawthorne has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.
Demographics
Demographics Beaver dam vs Hawthorne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Beaver dam | Hawthorne |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 71 |
White | 81 | 18 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 8 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Hawthorne
- In Hawthorne, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 71% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
- Beaver dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 18% in Hawthorne.
- The Asian population is larger in Beaver dam at 2% compared to 0% in Hawthorne.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Beaver dam at 8% compared to 3% in Hawthorne.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hawthorne at 8%, compared to 6% in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beaver dam and Hawthorne at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Beaver dam | Hawthorne |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 13.2% |
Depression | 23.6% | 19.6% |
Smoking | 17.6% | 22.5% |
Binge Drinking | 23.5% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 36.6% | 36.3% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Hawthorne
- In Hawthorne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Beaver dam at 23.6% compared to 19.6% in Hawthorne.
- Hawthorne has a higher smoking rate at 22.5% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
- Binge drinking is more common in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 14.9% in Hawthorne.
- Obesity rates are higher in Beaver dam at 36.6% compared to 36.3% in Hawthorne.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hawthorne at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaver dam.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Beaver dam | Hawthorne |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (47) | 0.2% (3) |
High School Diploma | 23.8% (3,947) | 26.2% (389) |
Less than High School | 10.3% (1,706) | 10.0% (148) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.2% (3,023) | 12.2% (181) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beaver dam vs Hawthorne
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Hawthorne.
- In Hawthorne, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.2% compared to 23.8% in Beaver dam.
- More residents in Beaver dam have less than a high school education at 10.3% compared to 10.0% in Hawthorne.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 12.2% in Hawthorne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.