Demographics details for Beaver dam, WI vs Hawthorne, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Beaver dam, WI vs Hawthorne, FL.

Data Beaver dam Hawthorne
Population 16,582 1,483
Median Age 40.4 years 38.4 years
Median Income $65,802 $49,479
Married Families 35.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 16%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 3.5

Population Comparison: Beaver dam vs Hawthorne

  • In Beaver dam, the population is higher at 16,582, compared to 1,483 in Hawthorne.
  • Residents in Beaver dam have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 38.4 years in Hawthorne.
  • Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802 compared to $49,479 in Hawthorne.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Beaver dam and Hawthorne at 35.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Hawthorne at 16%, compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
  • Hawthorne has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.

Demographics

Demographics Beaver dam vs Hawthorne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Beaver dam Hawthorne
Black 3 71
White 81 18
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 8 3
Two or More Races 6 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Hawthorne

  • In Hawthorne, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 71% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
  • Beaver dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 18% in Hawthorne.
  • The Asian population is larger in Beaver dam at 2% compared to 0% in Hawthorne.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Beaver dam at 8% compared to 3% in Hawthorne.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hawthorne at 8%, compared to 6% in Beaver dam.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beaver dam and Hawthorne at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Beaver dam Hawthorne
Mental Health Not Good 15.7% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.6% 13.2%
Depression 23.6% 19.6%
Smoking 17.6% 22.5%
Binge Drinking 23.5% 14.9%
Obesity 36.6% 36.3%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Hawthorne

  • In Hawthorne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Beaver dam at 23.6% compared to 19.6% in Hawthorne.
  • Hawthorne has a higher smoking rate at 22.5% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 14.9% in Hawthorne.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Beaver dam at 36.6% compared to 36.3% in Hawthorne.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hawthorne at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaver dam.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Beaver dam Hawthorne
No Schooling 0.3% (47) 0.2% (3)
High School Diploma 23.8% (3,947) 26.2% (389)
Less than High School 10.3% (1,706) 10.0% (148)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.2% (3,023) 12.2% (181)

Education Levels Comparison: Beaver dam vs Hawthorne

  • A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Hawthorne.
  • In Hawthorne, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.2% compared to 23.8% in Beaver dam.
  • More residents in Beaver dam have less than a high school education at 10.3% compared to 10.0% in Hawthorne.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 12.2% in Hawthorne.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.