Demographics details for Beaver dam, WI vs Grand prairie, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beaver dam, WI vs Grand prairie, TX.
| Data | Beaver dam | Grand prairie |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,582 | 201,843 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $65,802 | $76,626 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Beaver dam vs Grand prairie
- The population in Grand prairie is higher at 201,843, compared to 16,582 in Beaver dam.
- Residents in Beaver dam have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 33.7 years in Grand prairie.
- Grand prairie has a higher median income of $76,626, compared to $65,802 in Beaver dam.
- In Grand prairie, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
- The poverty level is higher in Grand prairie at 14%, compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- Grand prairie has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.
Demographics
Demographics Beaver dam vs Grand prairie provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Beaver dam | Grand prairie |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 23 |
| White | 81 | 9 |
| Asian | 2 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Grand prairie
- In Grand prairie, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
- Beaver dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 9% in Grand prairie.
- In Grand prairie, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 2% in Beaver dam.
- Grand prairie has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 8% in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand prairie at 14%, compared to 6% in Beaver dam.
- In Grand prairie, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Beaver dam | Grand prairie |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.5% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Grand prairie
- In Grand prairie, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Beaver dam at 23.6% compared to 21.4% in Grand prairie.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Beaver dam at 17.6% compared to 16.1% in Grand prairie.
- Binge drinking is more common in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 17.3% in Grand prairie.
- Obesity rates are higher in Beaver dam at 36.6% compared to 34.9% in Grand prairie.
- Disability percentages are higher in Beaver dam at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Grand prairie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Beaver dam | Grand prairie |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (47) | 2.2% (4,493) |
| High School Diploma | 23.8% (3,947) | 12.9% (26,069) |
| Less than High School | 10.3% (1,706) | 21.3% (43,014) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.2% (3,023) | 16.4% (33,151) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beaver dam vs Grand prairie
- In Grand prairie, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 12.9% in Grand prairie.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grand prairie at 21.3%, compared to 10.3% in Beaver dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 16.4% in Grand prairie.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.