Demographics details for Beaver dam, WI vs Chetopa, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beaver dam, WI vs Chetopa, KS.
| Data | Beaver dam | Chetopa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,582 | 916 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 51.2 years |
| Median Income | $65,802 | $23,750 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Beaver dam vs Chetopa
- In Beaver dam, the population is higher at 16,582, compared to 916 in Chetopa.
- The median age in Chetopa is higher at 51.2 years, compared to 40.4 years in Beaver dam.
- Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802 compared to $23,750 in Chetopa.
- In Chetopa, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
- The poverty level is higher in Chetopa at 11%, compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Beaver dam and Chetopa at 3.1%.
Demographics
Demographics Beaver dam vs Chetopa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Beaver dam | Chetopa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 81 | 92 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Chetopa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Beaver dam at 3% compared to 0% in Chetopa.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chetopa at 92% compared to 81% in Beaver dam.
- The Asian population is larger in Beaver dam at 2% compared to 0% in Chetopa.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Beaver dam at 8% compared to 4% in Chetopa.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Beaver dam at 6% compared to 3% in Chetopa.
- In Chetopa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Beaver dam | Chetopa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 24.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.5% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 45.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 43.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Chetopa
- In Chetopa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Beaver dam at 23.6% compared to 23.4% in Chetopa.
- Chetopa has a higher smoking rate at 24.7% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
- Binge drinking is more common in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 17.6% in Chetopa.
- Chetopa has higher obesity rates at 45.6% compared to 36.6% in Beaver dam.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chetopa at 43.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaver dam.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Beaver dam | Chetopa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (47) | 0.4% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 23.8% (3,947) | 30.1% (276) |
| Less than High School | 10.3% (1,706) | 19.0% (174) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.2% (3,023) | 10.8% (99) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beaver dam vs Chetopa
- In Chetopa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
- In Chetopa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.1% compared to 23.8% in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chetopa at 19.0%, compared to 10.3% in Beaver dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 10.8% in Chetopa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.