Demographics details for Beaver dam, WI vs Carrollton, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beaver dam, WI vs Carrollton, GA.
| Data | Beaver dam | Carrollton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,582 | 27,262 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 27.5 years |
| Median Income | $65,802 | $46,722 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Beaver dam vs Carrollton
- The population in Carrollton is higher at 27,262, compared to 16,582 in Beaver dam.
- Residents in Beaver dam have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 27.5 years in Carrollton.
- Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802 compared to $46,722 in Carrollton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Beaver dam at 35.0% compared to 27.0% in Carrollton.
- The poverty level is higher in Carrollton at 15%, compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- Carrollton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.
Demographics
Demographics Beaver dam vs Carrollton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Beaver dam | Carrollton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 36 |
| White | 81 | 47 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Carrollton
- In Carrollton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 36% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
- Beaver dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 47% in Carrollton.
- The Asian population is larger in Beaver dam at 2% compared to 1% in Carrollton.
- Carrollton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 8% in Beaver dam.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Beaver dam at 6% compared to 5% in Carrollton.
- In Carrollton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Beaver dam | Carrollton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.5% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Carrollton
- In Carrollton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Beaver dam at 23.6% compared to 20.9% in Carrollton.
- Carrollton has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
- Binge drinking is more common in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 14.7% in Carrollton.
- Carrollton has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 36.6% in Beaver dam.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carrollton at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaver dam.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Beaver dam | Carrollton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (47) | 0.8% (212) |
| High School Diploma | 23.8% (3,947) | 12.6% (3,426) |
| Less than High School | 10.3% (1,706) | 11.5% (3,126) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.2% (3,023) | 16.9% (4,617) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beaver dam vs Carrollton
- In Carrollton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 12.6% in Carrollton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carrollton at 11.5%, compared to 10.3% in Beaver dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 16.9% in Carrollton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.