Demographics details for Beaver dam, WI vs Broussard, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beaver dam, WI vs Broussard, LA.
| Data | Beaver dam | Broussard |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,582 | 14,186 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 32.9 years |
| Median Income | $65,802 | $94,912 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Beaver dam vs Broussard
- In Beaver dam, the population is higher at 16,582, compared to 14,186 in Broussard.
- Residents in Beaver dam have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 32.9 years in Broussard.
- Broussard has a higher median income of $94,912, compared to $65,802 in Beaver dam.
- In Broussard, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
- The poverty level is higher in Broussard at 10%, compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- Broussard has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.
Demographics
Demographics Beaver dam vs Broussard provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Beaver dam | Broussard |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 19 |
| White | 81 | 74 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Broussard
- In Broussard, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
- Beaver dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 74% in Broussard.
- The Asian population is larger in Beaver dam at 2% compared to 1% in Broussard.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Beaver dam at 8% compared to 3% in Broussard.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Beaver dam at 6% compared to 3% in Broussard.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beaver dam and Broussard at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Beaver dam | Broussard |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 16.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.5% | 20.8% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 36.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Broussard
- In Broussard, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Broussard at 26.6% versus 23.6% in Beaver dam.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Beaver dam at 17.6% compared to 16.9% in Broussard.
- Binge drinking is more common in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 20.8% in Broussard.
- Obesity rates are higher in Beaver dam at 36.6% compared to 36.1% in Broussard.
- Disability percentages are higher in Beaver dam at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Broussard.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Beaver dam | Broussard |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (47) | 0.4% (59) |
| High School Diploma | 23.8% (3,947) | 13.3% (1,881) |
| Less than High School | 10.3% (1,706) | 10.0% (1,414) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.2% (3,023) | 21.5% (3,043) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beaver dam vs Broussard
- In Broussard, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 13.3% in Broussard.
- More residents in Beaver dam have less than a high school education at 10.3% compared to 10.0% in Broussard.
- In Broussard, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 18.2% in Beaver dam.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.