Demographics details for Beaver dam, WI vs Bloomington, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Beaver dam, WI vs Bloomington, IN.

Data Beaver dam Bloomington
Population 16,582 79,107
Median Age 40.4 years 24.4 years
Median Income $65,802 $46,543
Married Families 35.0% 23.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 6.2

Population Comparison: Beaver dam vs Bloomington

  • The population in Bloomington is higher at 79,107, compared to 16,582 in Beaver dam.
  • Residents in Beaver dam have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 24.4 years in Bloomington.
  • Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802 compared to $46,543 in Bloomington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Beaver dam at 35.0% compared to 23.0% in Bloomington.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bloomington at 18%, compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
  • Bloomington has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.

Demographics

Demographics Beaver dam vs Bloomington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Beaver dam Bloomington
Black 3 5
White 81 75
Asian 2 11
Hispanic 8 4
Two or More Races 6 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Bloomington

  • In Bloomington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
  • Beaver dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 75% in Bloomington.
  • In Bloomington, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 2% in Beaver dam.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Beaver dam at 8% compared to 4% in Bloomington.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Beaver dam at 6% compared to 5% in Bloomington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beaver dam and Bloomington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Beaver dam Bloomington
Mental Health Not Good 15.7% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 10.6% 11.7%
Depression 23.6% 26.7%
Smoking 17.6% 17.0%
Binge Drinking 23.5% 16.7%
Obesity 36.6% 34.4%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Beaver dam vs Bloomington

  • In Bloomington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Bloomington at 26.7% versus 23.6% in Beaver dam.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Beaver dam at 17.6% compared to 17.0% in Bloomington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 16.7% in Bloomington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Beaver dam at 36.6% compared to 34.4% in Bloomington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Beaver dam at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Bloomington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Beaver dam Bloomington
No Schooling 0.3% (47) 0.1% (95)
High School Diploma 23.8% (3,947) 5.8% (4,606)
Less than High School 10.3% (1,706) 4.2% (3,311)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.2% (3,023) 29.0% (22,911)

Education Levels Comparison: Beaver dam vs Bloomington

  • A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.1% in Bloomington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Beaver dam hold a high school diploma at 23.8% compared to 5.8% in Bloomington.
  • More residents in Beaver dam have less than a high school education at 10.3% compared to 4.2% in Bloomington.
  • In Bloomington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.0% compared to 18.2% in Beaver dam.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.