Demographics details for Beacon, IA vs Pleasant grove, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beacon, IA vs Pleasant grove, UT.
Data | Beacon | Pleasant grove |
---|---|---|
Population | 430 | 37,630 |
Median Age | 39.6 years | 27.6 years |
Median Income | $54,250 | $91,322 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Beacon vs Pleasant grove
- The population in Pleasant grove is higher at 37,630, compared to 430 in Beacon.
- Residents in Beacon have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 27.6 years in Pleasant grove.
- Pleasant grove has a higher median income of $91,322, compared to $54,250 in Beacon.
- In Pleasant grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 44.0% in Beacon.
- Beacon has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 7% in Pleasant grove.
- Pleasant grove has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Beacon.
Demographics
Demographics Beacon vs Pleasant grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Beacon | Pleasant grove |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | Data is updating |
White | 88 | 81 |
Asian | 3 | 2 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 10 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Beacon vs Pleasant grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Beacon at 3% compared to 0% in Pleasant grove.
- Beacon has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 81% in Pleasant grove.
- The Asian population is larger in Beacon at 3% compared to 2% in Pleasant grove.
- Pleasant grove has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 0% in Beacon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pleasant grove at 7%, compared to 6% in Beacon.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beacon and Pleasant grove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Beacon | Pleasant grove |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 10.3% |
Depression | 18.4% | 23.9% |
Smoking | 18.5% | 7.2% |
Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 8.3% |
Obesity | 38.1% | 30.6% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beacon vs Pleasant grove
- More residents in Beacon report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 14.8% in Pleasant grove.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pleasant grove at 23.9% versus 18.4% in Beacon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Beacon at 18.5% compared to 7.2% in Pleasant grove.
- Binge drinking is more common in Beacon at 21.4% compared to 8.3% in Pleasant grove.
- Obesity rates are higher in Beacon at 38.1% compared to 30.6% in Pleasant grove.
- Disability percentages are higher in Beacon at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Pleasant grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Beacon | Pleasant grove |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (1) | 0.6% (207) |
High School Diploma | 26.3% (113) | 8.2% (3,089) |
Less than High School | 18.4% (79) | 4.9% (1,844) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.0% (26) | 22.1% (8,335) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beacon vs Pleasant grove
- In Pleasant grove, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Beacon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beacon hold a high school diploma at 26.3% compared to 8.2% in Pleasant grove.
- More residents in Beacon have less than a high school education at 18.4% compared to 4.9% in Pleasant grove.
- In Pleasant grove, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.1% compared to 6.0% in Beacon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.