Demographics details for Beacon, IA vs Mokelumne hill, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beacon, IA vs Mokelumne hill, CA.
Data | Beacon | Mokelumne hill |
---|---|---|
Population | 430 | 808 |
Median Age | 39.6 years | 61.8 years |
Median Income | $54,250 | $81,483 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 65.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Beacon vs Mokelumne hill
- The population in Mokelumne hill is higher at 808, compared to 430 in Beacon.
- The median age in Mokelumne hill is higher at 61.8 years, compared to 39.6 years in Beacon.
- Mokelumne hill has a higher median income of $81,483, compared to $54,250 in Beacon.
- In Mokelumne hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 65.0%, compared to 44.0% in Beacon.
- The poverty level is higher in Mokelumne hill at 10%, compared to 8% in Beacon.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Beacon and Mokelumne hill at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Beacon vs Mokelumne hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Beacon | Mokelumne hill |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 15 |
White | 88 | 48 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 24 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Beacon vs Mokelumne hill
- In Mokelumne hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 3% in Beacon.
- Beacon has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 48% in Mokelumne hill.
- The Asian population is larger in Beacon at 3% compared to 0% in Mokelumne hill.
- Mokelumne hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 0% in Beacon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mokelumne hill at 13%, compared to 6% in Beacon.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Beacon and Mokelumne hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Beacon | Mokelumne hill |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 19.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 13.6% |
Depression | 18.4% | 24.2% |
Smoking | 18.5% | 17.6% |
Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 38.1% | 32.4% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beacon vs Mokelumne hill
- In Mokelumne hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 15.4% in Beacon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mokelumne hill at 24.2% versus 18.4% in Beacon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Beacon at 18.5% compared to 17.6% in Mokelumne hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Beacon at 21.4% compared to 16.7% in Mokelumne hill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Beacon at 38.1% compared to 32.4% in Mokelumne hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Beacon at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Mokelumne hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Beacon | Mokelumne hill |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (1) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 26.3% (113) | 12.5% (101) |
Less than High School | 18.4% (79) | 8.7% (70) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.0% (26) | 20.2% (163) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beacon vs Mokelumne hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Beacon have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Mokelumne hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beacon hold a high school diploma at 26.3% compared to 12.5% in Mokelumne hill.
- More residents in Beacon have less than a high school education at 18.4% compared to 8.7% in Mokelumne hill.
- In Mokelumne hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 6.0% in Beacon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.