Demographics details for Beacon, IA vs Citrus heights, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beacon, IA vs Citrus heights, CA.
| Data | Beacon | Citrus heights |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 430 | 86,433 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $54,250 | $75,022 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Beacon vs Citrus heights
- The population in Citrus heights is higher at 86,433, compared to 430 in Beacon.
- Residents in Beacon have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 38.1 years in Citrus heights.
- Citrus heights has a higher median income of $75,022, compared to $54,250 in Beacon.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Beacon at 44.0% compared to 36.0% in Citrus heights.
- The poverty level is higher in Citrus heights at 10%, compared to 8% in Beacon.
- Citrus heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Beacon.
Demographics
Demographics Beacon vs Citrus heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Beacon | Citrus heights |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 3 |
| White | 88 | 62 |
| Asian | 3 | 5 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Beacon vs Citrus heights
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Beacon and Citrus heights at 3%.
- Beacon has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 62% in Citrus heights.
- In Citrus heights, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 3% in Beacon.
- Citrus heights has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 0% in Beacon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Citrus heights at 9%, compared to 6% in Beacon.
- In Citrus heights, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Beacon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Beacon | Citrus heights |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 18.4% | 21.5% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 32.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beacon vs Citrus heights
- In Citrus heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 15.4% in Beacon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Citrus heights at 21.5% versus 18.4% in Beacon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Beacon at 18.5% compared to 14.1% in Citrus heights.
- Binge drinking is more common in Beacon at 21.4% compared to 17.3% in Citrus heights.
- Obesity rates are higher in Beacon at 38.1% compared to 32.8% in Citrus heights.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Citrus heights at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Beacon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Beacon | Citrus heights |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (1) | 1.5% (1,266) |
| High School Diploma | 26.3% (113) | 15.8% (13,657) |
| Less than High School | 18.4% (79) | 12.5% (10,787) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.0% (26) | 15.8% (13,696) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beacon vs Citrus heights
- In Citrus heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.2% in Beacon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beacon hold a high school diploma at 26.3% compared to 15.8% in Citrus heights.
- More residents in Beacon have less than a high school education at 18.4% compared to 12.5% in Citrus heights.
- In Citrus heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 6.0% in Beacon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.