Demographics details for Beacon, IA vs Bridgeport, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Beacon, IA vs Bridgeport, TX.
| Data | Beacon | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 430 | 6,321 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 33.9 years |
| Median Income | $54,250 | $96,231 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Beacon vs Bridgeport
- The population in Bridgeport is higher at 6,321, compared to 430 in Beacon.
- Residents in Beacon have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 33.9 years in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher median income of $96,231, compared to $54,250 in Beacon.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Beacon at 44.0% compared to 38.0% in Bridgeport.
- The poverty level is higher in Bridgeport at 10%, compared to 8% in Beacon.
- Bridgeport has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Beacon.
Demographics
Demographics Beacon vs Bridgeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Beacon | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 5 |
| White | 88 | 51 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 36 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Beacon vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Beacon.
- Beacon has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 51% in Bridgeport.
- The Asian population is larger in Beacon at 3% compared to 1% in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 0% in Beacon.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Beacon at 6% compared to 5% in Bridgeport.
- In Bridgeport, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Beacon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Beacon | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 18.4% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 20.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Beacon vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.4% in Beacon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bridgeport at 24.0% versus 18.4% in Beacon.
- Bridgeport has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 18.5% in Beacon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Beacon at 21.4% compared to 17.2% in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 38.1% in Beacon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Beacon at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Bridgeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Beacon | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (1) | 0.4% (24) |
| High School Diploma | 26.3% (113) | 11.2% (708) |
| Less than High School | 18.4% (79) | 18.8% (1,189) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.0% (26) | 17.2% (1,086) |
Education Levels Comparison: Beacon vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Beacon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Beacon hold a high school diploma at 26.3% compared to 11.2% in Bridgeport.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bridgeport at 18.8%, compared to 18.4% in Beacon.
- In Bridgeport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 6.0% in Beacon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.