Demographics details for Baxter, TN vs Eureka, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Baxter, TN vs Eureka, MO.
| Data | Baxter | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,836 | 12,729 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $57,829 | $104,697 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Baxter vs Eureka
- The population in Eureka is higher at 12,729, compared to 1,836 in Baxter.
- The median age in Eureka is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 36.4 years in Baxter.
- Eureka has a higher median income of $104,697, compared to $57,829 in Baxter.
- In Eureka, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 32.0% in Baxter.
- Baxter has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Eureka.
- The unemployment rate in Baxter is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.2% in Eureka.
Demographics
Demographics Baxter vs Eureka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Baxter | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 92 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Baxter vs Eureka
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Baxter at 2% compared to 0% in Eureka.
- Baxter has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 88% in Eureka.
- In Eureka, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Baxter.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Baxter and Eureka at 2%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Eureka at 8%, compared to 4% in Baxter.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Baxter and Eureka at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Baxter | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.8% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 31.3% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 26.6% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 21.9% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 30.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Baxter vs Eureka
- More residents in Baxter report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 14.2% in Eureka.
- Depression is more prevalent in Baxter at 31.3% compared to 22.8% in Eureka.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Baxter at 26.6% compared to 14.1% in Eureka.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Eureka at 21.9% compared to 14.7% in Baxter.
- Obesity rates are higher in Baxter at 36.5% compared to 30.0% in Eureka.
- Disability percentages are higher in Baxter at 20.0% compared to 7.0% in Eureka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Baxter | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (4) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.7% (416) | 10.5% (1,337) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (178) | 3.2% (405) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.6% (103) | 30.1% (3,835) |
Education Levels Comparison: Baxter vs Eureka
- A higher percentage of residents in Baxter have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Eureka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Baxter hold a high school diploma at 22.7% compared to 10.5% in Eureka.
- More residents in Baxter have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 3.2% in Eureka.
- In Eureka, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 5.6% in Baxter.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.