Demographics details for Bartlett, IL vs Lexington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bartlett, IL vs Lexington, NC.
Data | Bartlett | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Population | 40,154 | 19,679 |
Median Age | 41.1 years | 38.6 years |
Median Income | $126,555 | $36,868 |
Married Families | 52.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Bartlett vs Lexington
- In Bartlett, the population is higher at 40,154, compared to 19,679 in Lexington.
- Residents in Bartlett have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 38.6 years in Lexington.
- Bartlett has a higher median income of $126,555 compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bartlett at 52.0% compared to 31.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 15%, compared to 9% in Bartlett.
- The unemployment rate in Bartlett is higher at 5.6%, compared to 5.2% in Lexington.
Demographics
Demographics Bartlett vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bartlett | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 31 |
White | 58 | 38 |
Asian | 17 | 4 |
Hispanic | 15 | 16 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bartlett vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 31% compared to 4% in Bartlett.
- Bartlett has a higher percentage of White residents at 58% compared to 38% in Lexington.
- The Asian population is larger in Bartlett at 17% compared to 4% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 15% in Bartlett.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 11%, compared to 5% in Bartlett.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bartlett at 1% compared to 0% in Lexington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bartlett | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 15.5% |
Depression | 17.2% | 25.0% |
Smoking | 11.4% | 24.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 27.9% | 42.7% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bartlett vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 12.7% in Bartlett.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 25.0% versus 17.2% in Bartlett.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 11.4% in Bartlett.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bartlett at 17.7% compared to 13.8% in Lexington.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 27.9% in Bartlett.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lexington at 18.0% compared to 8.0% in Bartlett.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bartlett | Lexington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (341) | 2.7% (531) |
High School Diploma | 13.5% (5,427) | 17.0% (3,355) |
Less than High School | 6.1% (2,440) | 25.6% (5,036) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.2% (13,713) | 10.2% (2,009) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bartlett vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.8% in Bartlett.
- In Lexington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 13.5% in Bartlett.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 25.6%, compared to 6.1% in Bartlett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bartlett hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.2% compared to 10.2% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.