Demographics details for Bartlesville, OK vs Central falls, RI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bartlesville, OK vs Central falls, RI.

Data Bartlesville Central falls
Population 37,795 22,490
Median Age 37.5 years 31.5 years
Median Income $58,230 $43,092
Married Families 40.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 12% 20%
Unemployment Rate 3.9 5.3

Population Comparison: Bartlesville vs Central falls

  • In Bartlesville, the population is higher at 37,795, compared to 22,490 in Central falls.
  • Residents in Bartlesville have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
  • Bartlesville has a higher median income of $58,230 compared to $43,092 in Central falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Bartlesville at 40.0% compared to 29.0% in Central falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Central falls at 20%, compared to 12% in Bartlesville.
  • Central falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.9% in Bartlesville.

Demographics

Demographics Bartlesville vs Central falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bartlesville Central falls
Black 4 8
White 70 4
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 7 69
Two or More Races 9 18
American Indian 8 1

Demographics Comparison: Bartlesville vs Central falls

  • In Central falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 4% in Bartlesville.
  • Bartlesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 4% in Central falls.
  • The Asian population is larger in Bartlesville at 2% compared to 0% in Central falls.
  • Central falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 69%, compared to 7% in Bartlesville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central falls at 18%, compared to 9% in Bartlesville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bartlesville at 8% compared to 1% in Central falls.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bartlesville Central falls
Mental Health Not Good 18.0% 19.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% 17.4%
Depression 24.9% 26.7%
Smoking 19.2% 22.8%
Binge Drinking 14.2% 14.2%
Obesity 41.3% 40.6%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bartlesville vs Central falls

  • In Central falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 18.0% in Bartlesville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central falls at 26.7% versus 24.9% in Bartlesville.
  • Central falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 19.2% in Bartlesville.
  • Binge drinking rates are similar in both Bartlesville and Central falls at 14.2%.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Bartlesville at 41.3% compared to 40.6% in Central falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Bartlesville at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Central falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bartlesville Central falls
No Schooling 0.7% (275) 4.7% (1,048)
High School Diploma 16.6% (6,277) 15.1% (3,406)
Less than High School 9.5% (3,604) 44.1% (9,911)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.2% (8,399) 5.6% (1,270)

Education Levels Comparison: Bartlesville vs Central falls

  • In Central falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 0.7% in Bartlesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bartlesville hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 15.1% in Central falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central falls at 44.1%, compared to 9.5% in Bartlesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bartlesville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.2% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.