Demographics details for Barrington, NJ vs Sloatsburg, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Barrington, NJ vs Sloatsburg, NY.

Data Barrington Sloatsburg
Population 7,036 3,008
Median Age 45.5 years 43.7 years
Median Income $82,070 $104,602
Married Families 44.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 7% 2%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Barrington vs Sloatsburg

  • In Barrington, the population is higher at 7,036, compared to 3,008 in Sloatsburg.
  • Residents in Barrington have a higher median age of 45.5 years compared to 43.7 years in Sloatsburg.
  • Sloatsburg has a higher median income of $104,602, compared to $82,070 in Barrington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Barrington at 44.0% compared to 40.0% in Sloatsburg.
  • Barrington has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 2% in Sloatsburg.
  • The unemployment rate in Barrington is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Sloatsburg.

Demographics

Demographics Barrington vs Sloatsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Barrington Sloatsburg
Black 1 6
White 88 63
Asian 3 4
Hispanic 3 14
Two or More Races 5 9
American Indian Data is updating 4

Demographics Comparison: Barrington vs Sloatsburg

  • In Sloatsburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Barrington.
  • Barrington has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 63% in Sloatsburg.
  • In Sloatsburg, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Barrington.
  • Sloatsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 3% in Barrington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sloatsburg at 9%, compared to 5% in Barrington.
  • In Sloatsburg, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Barrington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Barrington Sloatsburg
Mental Health Not Good 15.7% 12.5%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 7.9%
Depression 23.5% 18.6%
Smoking 14.3% 12.0%
Binge Drinking 19.5% 17.4%
Obesity 28.3% 23.9%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Barrington vs Sloatsburg

  • More residents in Barrington report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 12.5% in Sloatsburg.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Barrington at 23.5% compared to 18.6% in Sloatsburg.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Barrington at 14.3% compared to 12.0% in Sloatsburg.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Barrington at 19.5% compared to 17.4% in Sloatsburg.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Barrington at 28.3% compared to 23.9% in Sloatsburg.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Barrington at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Sloatsburg.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Barrington Sloatsburg
No Schooling 0.2% (13) 0.4% (11)
High School Diploma 18.8% (1,322) 17.4% (524)
Less than High School 6.9% (487) 6.7% (202)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 33.9% (2,387) 30.3% (912)

Education Levels Comparison: Barrington vs Sloatsburg

  • In Sloatsburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Barrington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Barrington hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 17.4% in Sloatsburg.
  • More residents in Barrington have less than a high school education at 6.9% compared to 6.7% in Sloatsburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Barrington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.9% compared to 30.3% in Sloatsburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.