Demographics details for Barrington, NJ vs Pantego, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Barrington, NJ vs Pantego, NC.
| Data | Barrington | Pantego |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,036 | 161 |
| Median Age | 45.5 years | 9.4 years |
| Median Income | $82,070 | $67,292 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 55.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Barrington vs Pantego
- In Barrington, the population is higher at 7,036, compared to 161 in Pantego.
- Residents in Barrington have a higher median age of 45.5 years compared to 9.4 years in Pantego.
- Barrington has a higher median income of $82,070 compared to $67,292 in Pantego.
- In Pantego, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 44.0% in Barrington.
- The poverty level is higher in Pantego at 10%, compared to 7% in Barrington.
- The unemployment rate in Barrington is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Pantego.
Demographics
Demographics Barrington vs Pantego provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Barrington | Pantego |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 12 |
| White | 88 | -248 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 168 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 168 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Barrington vs Pantego
- In Pantego, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 1% in Barrington.
- Barrington has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to -248% in Pantego.
- The Asian population is larger in Barrington at 3% compared to 0% in Pantego.
- Pantego has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 168%, compared to 3% in Barrington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pantego at 168%, compared to 5% in Barrington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Barrington and Pantego at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Barrington | Pantego |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 14.3% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 28.3% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Barrington vs Pantego
- In Pantego, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.7% in Barrington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Barrington at 23.5% compared to 22.5% in Pantego.
- Pantego has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 14.3% in Barrington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Barrington at 19.5% compared to 17.4% in Pantego.
- Pantego has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 28.3% in Barrington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pantego at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Barrington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Barrington | Pantego |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (13) | 0.6% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (1,322) | 24.2% (39) |
| Less than High School | 6.9% (487) | 10.6% (17) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.9% (2,387) | 18.0% (29) |
Education Levels Comparison: Barrington vs Pantego
- In Pantego, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Barrington.
- In Pantego, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.2% compared to 18.8% in Barrington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pantego at 10.6%, compared to 6.9% in Barrington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Barrington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.9% compared to 18.0% in Pantego.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.