Demographics details for Barrington, NJ vs Palmer, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Barrington, NJ vs Palmer, MA.
| Data | Barrington | Palmer |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,036 | 3,900 |
| Median Age | 45.5 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $82,070 | $65,000 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 55.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Barrington vs Palmer
- In Barrington, the population is higher at 7,036, compared to 3,900 in Palmer.
- Residents in Barrington have a higher median age of 45.5 years compared to 42.0 years in Palmer.
- Barrington has a higher median income of $82,070 compared to $65,000 in Palmer.
- In Palmer, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 44.0% in Barrington.
- The poverty level is higher in Palmer at 10%, compared to 7% in Barrington.
- The unemployment rate in Barrington is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Palmer.
Demographics
Demographics Barrington vs Palmer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Barrington | Palmer |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 88 | 96 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Barrington vs Palmer
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Barrington and Palmer at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Palmer at 96% compared to 88% in Barrington.
- The Asian population is larger in Barrington at 3% compared to 1% in Palmer.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Barrington at 3% compared to 2% in Palmer.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Barrington at 5% compared to 0% in Palmer.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Barrington and Palmer at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Barrington | Palmer |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 23.5% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 14.3% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 28.3% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Barrington vs Palmer
- More residents in Barrington report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
- Depression is more prevalent in Barrington at 23.5% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Barrington at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
- Binge drinking is more common in Barrington at 19.5% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
- Obesity rates are higher in Barrington at 28.3% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
- Disability percentages are higher in Barrington at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Barrington | Palmer |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (13) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (1,322) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 6.9% (487) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.9% (2,387) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Barrington vs Palmer
- A higher percentage of residents in Barrington have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Barrington hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
- More residents in Barrington have less than a high school education at 6.9% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Barrington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.9% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.