Demographics details for Barrington, NJ vs Mcpherson, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Barrington, NJ vs Mcpherson, KS.
| Data | Barrington | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,036 | 13,865 |
| Median Age | 45.5 years | 36.2 years |
| Median Income | $82,070 | $69,807 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Barrington vs Mcpherson
- The population in Mcpherson is higher at 13,865, compared to 7,036 in Barrington.
- Residents in Barrington have a higher median age of 45.5 years compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
- Barrington has a higher median income of $82,070 compared to $69,807 in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Barrington at 44.0% compared to 43.0% in Mcpherson.
- The poverty level is higher in Mcpherson at 9%, compared to 7% in Barrington.
- The unemployment rate in Barrington is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Barrington vs Mcpherson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Barrington | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 88 | 87 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Barrington vs Mcpherson
- In Mcpherson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Barrington.
- Barrington has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 87% in Mcpherson.
- The Asian population is larger in Barrington at 3% compared to 1% in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Barrington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Barrington at 5% compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Barrington and Mcpherson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Barrington | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 14.3% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 28.3% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Barrington vs Mcpherson
- More residents in Barrington report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.2% in Mcpherson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Barrington at 23.5% compared to 20.1% in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 14.3% in Barrington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Barrington at 19.5% compared to 18.2% in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 28.3% in Barrington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Barrington at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Mcpherson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Barrington | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (13) | 0.3% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (1,322) | 12.8% (1,775) |
| Less than High School | 6.9% (487) | 5.8% (804) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.9% (2,387) | 21.7% (3,010) |
Education Levels Comparison: Barrington vs Mcpherson
- In Mcpherson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Barrington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Barrington hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 12.8% in Mcpherson.
- More residents in Barrington have less than a high school education at 6.9% compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Barrington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.9% compared to 21.7% in Mcpherson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.