Demographics details for Barnegat, NJ vs Lancaster, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Barnegat, NJ vs Lancaster, VA.
| Data | Barnegat | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,284 | 10,750 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 59.2 years |
| Median Income | $98,621 | $62,674 |
| Married Families | 56.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Barnegat vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 10,750, compared to 3,284 in Barnegat.
- The median age in Lancaster is higher at 59.2 years, compared to 41.1 years in Barnegat.
- Barnegat has a higher median income of $98,621 compared to $62,674 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Barnegat at 56.0% compared to 46.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 10%, compared to 6% in Barnegat.
- The unemployment rate in Barnegat is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.1% in Lancaster.
Demographics
Demographics Barnegat vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Barnegat | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 28 |
| White | 86 | 66 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Barnegat vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 0% in Barnegat.
- Barnegat has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 66% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Barnegat at 2% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Barnegat at 10% compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 3%, compared to 2% in Barnegat.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Barnegat and Lancaster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Barnegat | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 32.6% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Barnegat vs Lancaster
- More residents in Barnegat report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 16.4% in Lancaster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Barnegat at 23.7% compared to 22.2% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 15.5% in Barnegat.
- Binge drinking is more common in Barnegat at 17.4% compared to 16.3% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 32.6% in Barnegat.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 17.0% compared to 6.0% in Barnegat.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Barnegat | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (20) | 1.5% (164) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (588) | 20.9% (2,244) |
| Less than High School | 9.8% (322) | 17.0% (1,823) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.5% (1,003) | 26.3% (2,823) |
Education Levels Comparison: Barnegat vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.6% in Barnegat.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.9% compared to 17.9% in Barnegat.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 17.0%, compared to 9.8% in Barnegat.
- A higher percentage of residents in Barnegat hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.5% compared to 26.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.