Demographics details for Barnegat, NJ vs Bethlehem, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Barnegat, NJ vs Bethlehem, PA.

Data Barnegat Bethlehem
Population 3,284 77,617
Median Age 41.1 years 35.9 years
Median Income $98,621 $62,072
Married Families 56.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 6% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Barnegat vs Bethlehem

  • The population in Bethlehem is higher at 77,617, compared to 3,284 in Barnegat.
  • Residents in Barnegat have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 35.9 years in Bethlehem.
  • Barnegat has a higher median income of $98,621 compared to $62,072 in Bethlehem.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Barnegat at 56.0% compared to 29.0% in Bethlehem.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bethlehem at 13%, compared to 6% in Barnegat.
  • The unemployment rate in Barnegat is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Bethlehem.

Demographics

Demographics Barnegat vs Bethlehem provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Barnegat Bethlehem
Black Data is updating 9
White 86 47
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 10 30
Two or More Races 2 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Barnegat vs Bethlehem

  • In Bethlehem, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Barnegat.
  • Barnegat has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 47% in Bethlehem.
  • In Bethlehem, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Barnegat.
  • Bethlehem has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 10% in Barnegat.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bethlehem at 11%, compared to 2% in Barnegat.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Barnegat and Bethlehem at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Barnegat Bethlehem
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 12.1%
Depression 23.7% 21.8%
Smoking 15.5% 18.4%
Binge Drinking 17.4% 17.6%
Obesity 32.6% 34.7%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Barnegat vs Bethlehem

  • In Bethlehem, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.6% in Barnegat.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Barnegat at 23.7% compared to 21.8% in Bethlehem.
  • Bethlehem has a higher smoking rate at 18.4% compared to 15.5% in Barnegat.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Bethlehem at 17.6% compared to 17.4% in Barnegat.
  • Bethlehem has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 32.6% in Barnegat.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bethlehem at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in Barnegat.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Barnegat Bethlehem
No Schooling 0.6% (20) 0.6% (452)
High School Diploma 17.9% (588) 16.9% (13,125)
Less than High School 9.8% (322) 12.9% (10,045)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 30.5% (1,003) 22.0% (17,044)

Education Levels Comparison: Barnegat vs Bethlehem

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Barnegat and Bethlehem at 0.6%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Barnegat hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 16.9% in Bethlehem.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bethlehem at 12.9%, compared to 9.8% in Barnegat.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Barnegat hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.5% compared to 22.0% in Bethlehem.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.