Demographics details for Banning, CA vs Kilmarnock, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Banning, CA vs Kilmarnock, VA.
| Data | Banning | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,683 | 1,428 |
| Median Age | 42.8 years | 60.2 years |
| Median Income | $54,083 | $36,875 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Banning vs Kilmarnock
- In Banning, the population is higher at 30,683, compared to 1,428 in Kilmarnock.
- The median age in Kilmarnock is higher at 60.2 years, compared to 42.8 years in Banning.
- Banning has a higher median income of $54,083 compared to $36,875 in Kilmarnock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Banning at 35.0% compared to 27.0% in Kilmarnock.
- Banning has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 11% in Kilmarnock.
- The unemployment rate in Banning is higher at 6.5%, compared to 3.4% in Kilmarnock.
Demographics
Demographics Banning vs Kilmarnock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Banning | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 23 |
| White | 21 | 74 |
| Asian | 5 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 48 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 2 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Banning vs Kilmarnock
- In Kilmarnock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 7% in Banning.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kilmarnock at 74% compared to 21% in Banning.
- The Asian population is larger in Banning at 5% compared to 1% in Kilmarnock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Banning at 48% compared to 0% in Kilmarnock.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Banning at 17% compared to 2% in Kilmarnock.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Banning at 2% compared to 0% in Kilmarnock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Banning | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 38.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Banning vs Kilmarnock
- More residents in Banning report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.1% in Kilmarnock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kilmarnock at 22.8% versus 18.5% in Banning.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Banning at 17.2% compared to 17.1% in Kilmarnock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kilmarnock at 15.7% compared to 15.2% in Banning.
- Obesity rates are higher in Banning at 39.1% compared to 38.0% in Kilmarnock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Banning at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in Kilmarnock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Banning | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (749) | 3.0% (43) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (5,655) | 20.7% (295) |
| Less than High School | 21.9% (6,720) | 22.0% (314) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.4% (3,495) | 17.2% (245) |
Education Levels Comparison: Banning vs Kilmarnock
- In Kilmarnock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 2.4% in Banning.
- In Kilmarnock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.7% compared to 18.4% in Banning.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kilmarnock at 22.0%, compared to 21.9% in Banning.
- In Kilmarnock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 11.4% in Banning.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.