Environment details: Baltic SD
pollution present, quality concerns raise alarm.
Environment details: Alcoa TN
Moderate quality, regular checks help.
Compare Environment: Baltic SD vs Alcoa TN
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
Metric | Baltic | Alcoa |
---|---|---|
CO2 Emissions | 121 | 741 |
Water Quality | 3/10 | 5/10 |
Water Quality Explanation | pollution present, quality concerns raise alarm. | Moderate quality, regular checks help. |
Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 1.0 |
Average Air Quality Index | 1.68 | 1.57 |
Worst AQI | 3.0 | 4.0 |
Days with Poor AQI | 21 | 29 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Baltic vs Alcoa
- The water quality in Alcoa is superior at 5/10 compared to 3/10 in Baltic.
- The median air quality index is lower (worse) in Baltic at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Alcoa.
- The average air quality index is worse in Baltic with 1.68 compared to 1.57 in Alcoa.
- Alcoa experiences more days with poor air quality at 29 compared to 21 in Baltic.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.