Demographics details for Baldwin, GA vs Union city, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Baldwin, GA vs Union city, PA.
Data | Baldwin | Union city |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,866 | 2,887 |
Median Age | 29.8 years | 46.6 years |
Median Income | $48,234 | $41,764 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Baldwin vs Union city
- In Baldwin, the population is higher at 3,866, compared to 2,887 in Union city.
- The median age in Union city is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 29.8 years in Baldwin.
- Baldwin has a higher median income of $48,234 compared to $41,764 in Union city.
- In Union city, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 32.0% in Baldwin.
- Baldwin has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.2% in Baldwin.
Demographics
Demographics Baldwin vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Baldwin | Union city |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 1 | 91 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 64 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 28 | 5 |
American Indian | 5 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Baldwin vs Union city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Baldwin at 1% compared to 0% in Union city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Union city at 91% compared to 1% in Baldwin.
- The Asian population is larger in Baldwin at 1% compared to 0% in Union city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Baldwin at 64% compared to 4% in Union city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Baldwin at 28% compared to 5% in Union city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Baldwin at 5% compared to 0% in Union city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Baldwin | Union city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 19.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 14.5% |
Depression | 23.3% | 24.6% |
Smoking | 21.3% | 25.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 35.3% | 39.2% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Baldwin vs Union city
- In Union city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 18.8% in Baldwin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Union city at 24.6% versus 23.3% in Baldwin.
- Union city has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 21.3% in Baldwin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Union city at 17.8% compared to 14.6% in Baldwin.
- Union city has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 35.3% in Baldwin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union city at 21.0% compared to 8.0% in Baldwin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Baldwin | Union city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.0% (155) | 0.3% (9) |
High School Diploma | 10.6% (409) | 42.5% (1,226) |
Less than High School | 42.2% (1,633) | 16.5% (476) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (392) | 8.2% (237) |
Education Levels Comparison: Baldwin vs Union city
- A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin have no formal schooling at 4.0% compared to 0.3% in Union city.
- In Union city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 42.5% compared to 10.6% in Baldwin.
- More residents in Baldwin have less than a high school education at 42.2% compared to 16.5% in Union city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.1% compared to 8.2% in Union city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.