Demographics details for Baldwin, GA vs Litchfield park, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Baldwin, GA vs Litchfield park, AZ.
| Data | Baldwin | Litchfield park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,866 | 6,960 |
| Median Age | 29.8 years | 47.7 years |
| Median Income | $48,234 | $117,601 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Baldwin vs Litchfield park
- The population in Litchfield park is higher at 6,960, compared to 3,866 in Baldwin.
- The median age in Litchfield park is higher at 47.7 years, compared to 29.8 years in Baldwin.
- Litchfield park has a higher median income of $117,601, compared to $48,234 in Baldwin.
- In Litchfield park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 32.0% in Baldwin.
- Baldwin has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Litchfield park.
- Litchfield park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.2% in Baldwin.
Demographics
Demographics Baldwin vs Litchfield park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Baldwin | Litchfield park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 1 | 57 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 64 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 28 | 12 |
| American Indian | 5 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Baldwin vs Litchfield park
- In Litchfield park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Baldwin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Litchfield park at 57% compared to 1% in Baldwin.
- In Litchfield park, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Baldwin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Baldwin at 64% compared to 23% in Litchfield park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Baldwin at 28% compared to 12% in Litchfield park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Baldwin at 5% compared to 0% in Litchfield park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Baldwin | Litchfield park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 8.3% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 18.9% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 10.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 35.3% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Baldwin vs Litchfield park
- More residents in Baldwin report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 15.0% in Litchfield park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Baldwin at 23.3% compared to 18.9% in Litchfield park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Baldwin at 21.3% compared to 10.7% in Litchfield park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Litchfield park at 18.9% compared to 14.6% in Baldwin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Baldwin at 35.3% compared to 27.2% in Litchfield park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Litchfield park at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Baldwin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Baldwin | Litchfield park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.0% (155) | 0.2% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 10.6% (409) | 11.2% (777) |
| Less than High School | 42.2% (1,633) | 2.2% (150) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (392) | 36.0% (2,504) |
Education Levels Comparison: Baldwin vs Litchfield park
- A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin have no formal schooling at 4.0% compared to 0.2% in Litchfield park.
- In Litchfield park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.2% compared to 10.6% in Baldwin.
- More residents in Baldwin have less than a high school education at 42.2% compared to 2.2% in Litchfield park.
- In Litchfield park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 10.1% in Baldwin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.