Demographics details for Baldwin park, CA vs Richardson, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Baldwin park, CA vs Richardson, TX.

Data Baldwin park Richardson
Population 69,455 118,802
Median Age 37.1 years 34.5 years
Median Income $76,002 $94,362
Married Families 37.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 12% 6%
Unemployment Rate 6.3 3.9

Population Comparison: Baldwin park vs Richardson

  • The population in Richardson is higher at 118,802, compared to 69,455 in Baldwin park.
  • Residents in Baldwin park have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 34.5 years in Richardson.
  • Richardson has a higher median income of $94,362, compared to $76,002 in Baldwin park.
  • In Richardson, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 37.0% in Baldwin park.
  • Baldwin park has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Richardson.
  • The unemployment rate in Baldwin park is higher at 6.3%, compared to 3.9% in Richardson.

Demographics

Demographics Baldwin park vs Richardson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Baldwin park Richardson
Black 1 12
White -25 49
Asian 23 15
Hispanic 75 17
Two or More Races 23 7
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Richardson

  • In Richardson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 1% in Baldwin park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Richardson at 49% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 15% in Richardson.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Baldwin park at 75% compared to 17% in Richardson.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 7% in Richardson.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Baldwin park at 3% compared to 0% in Richardson.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Baldwin park Richardson
Mental Health Not Good 15.4% 14.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% 8.9%
Depression 14.7% 20.9%
Smoking 11.4% 11.8%
Binge Drinking 14.2% 18.3%
Obesity 29.9% 28.2%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Richardson

  • More residents in Baldwin park report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 14.4% in Richardson.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Richardson at 20.9% versus 14.7% in Baldwin park.
  • Richardson has a higher smoking rate at 11.8% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Richardson at 18.3% compared to 14.2% in Baldwin park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Baldwin park at 29.9% compared to 28.2% in Richardson.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Baldwin park at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Richardson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Baldwin park Richardson
No Schooling 5.5% (3,853) 1.4% (1,646)
High School Diploma 18.1% (12,587) 6.8% (8,041)
Less than High School 41.7% (28,939) 8.4% (10,002)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.8% (6,787) 36.7% (43,584)

Education Levels Comparison: Baldwin park vs Richardson

  • A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 1.4% in Richardson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park hold a high school diploma at 18.1% compared to 6.8% in Richardson.
  • More residents in Baldwin park have less than a high school education at 41.7% compared to 8.4% in Richardson.
  • In Richardson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.7% compared to 9.8% in Baldwin park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.