Demographics details for Baldwin park, CA vs Potts camp, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Baldwin park, CA vs Potts camp, MS.

Data Baldwin park Potts camp
Population 69,455 409
Median Age 37.1 years 45.6 years
Median Income $76,002 $21,845
Married Families 37.0% 20.0%
Poverty Level 12% 25%
Unemployment Rate 6.3 5.2

Population Comparison: Baldwin park vs Potts camp

  • In Baldwin park, the population is higher at 69,455, compared to 409 in Potts camp.
  • The median age in Potts camp is higher at 45.6 years, compared to 37.1 years in Baldwin park.
  • Baldwin park has a higher median income of $76,002 compared to $21,845 in Potts camp.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Baldwin park at 37.0% compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.
  • The poverty level is higher in Potts camp at 25%, compared to 12% in Baldwin park.
  • The unemployment rate in Baldwin park is higher at 6.3%, compared to 5.2% in Potts camp.

Demographics

Demographics Baldwin park vs Potts camp provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Baldwin park Potts camp
Black 1 13
White -25 80
Asian 23 Data is updating
Hispanic 75 Data is updating
Two or More Races 23 7
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Potts camp

  • In Potts camp, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 1% in Baldwin park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Potts camp at 80% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Baldwin park at 75% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 7% in Potts camp.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Baldwin park at 3% compared to 0% in Potts camp.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Baldwin park Potts camp
Mental Health Not Good 15.4% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% 13.0%
Depression 14.7% 23.0%
Smoking 11.4% 21.7%
Binge Drinking 14.2% 13.8%
Obesity 29.9% 41.8%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Potts camp

  • In Potts camp, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.4% in Baldwin park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Potts camp at 23.0% versus 14.7% in Baldwin park.
  • Potts camp has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Baldwin park at 14.2% compared to 13.8% in Potts camp.
  • Potts camp has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Potts camp at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Baldwin park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Baldwin park Potts camp
No Schooling 5.5% (3,853) 0.5% (2)
High School Diploma 18.1% (12,587) 13.7% (56)
Less than High School 41.7% (28,939) 12.0% (49)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.8% (6,787) 8.1% (33)

Education Levels Comparison: Baldwin park vs Potts camp

  • A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.5% in Potts camp.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park hold a high school diploma at 18.1% compared to 13.7% in Potts camp.
  • More residents in Baldwin park have less than a high school education at 41.7% compared to 12.0% in Potts camp.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 8.1% in Potts camp.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.