Demographics details for Baldwin park, CA vs Potts camp, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Baldwin park, CA vs Potts camp, MS.
Data | Baldwin park | Potts camp |
---|---|---|
Population | 69,455 | 409 |
Median Age | 37.1 years | 45.6 years |
Median Income | $76,002 | $21,845 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 25% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.3 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Baldwin park vs Potts camp
- In Baldwin park, the population is higher at 69,455, compared to 409 in Potts camp.
- The median age in Potts camp is higher at 45.6 years, compared to 37.1 years in Baldwin park.
- Baldwin park has a higher median income of $76,002 compared to $21,845 in Potts camp.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Baldwin park at 37.0% compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.
- The poverty level is higher in Potts camp at 25%, compared to 12% in Baldwin park.
- The unemployment rate in Baldwin park is higher at 6.3%, compared to 5.2% in Potts camp.
Demographics
Demographics Baldwin park vs Potts camp provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Baldwin park | Potts camp |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 13 |
White | -25 | 80 |
Asian | 23 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 75 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 23 | 7 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Potts camp
- In Potts camp, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 1% in Baldwin park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Potts camp at 80% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
- The Asian population is larger in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Baldwin park at 75% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 7% in Potts camp.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Baldwin park at 3% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Baldwin park | Potts camp |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 17.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 13.0% |
Depression | 14.7% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 11.4% | 21.7% |
Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 29.9% | 41.8% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Potts camp
- In Potts camp, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.4% in Baldwin park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Potts camp at 23.0% versus 14.7% in Baldwin park.
- Potts camp has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Baldwin park at 14.2% compared to 13.8% in Potts camp.
- Potts camp has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Potts camp at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Baldwin park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Baldwin park | Potts camp |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 5.5% (3,853) | 0.5% (2) |
High School Diploma | 18.1% (12,587) | 13.7% (56) |
Less than High School | 41.7% (28,939) | 12.0% (49) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (6,787) | 8.1% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Baldwin park vs Potts camp
- A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.5% in Potts camp.
- A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park hold a high school diploma at 18.1% compared to 13.7% in Potts camp.
- More residents in Baldwin park have less than a high school education at 41.7% compared to 12.0% in Potts camp.
- A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 8.1% in Potts camp.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.