Demographics details for Baldwin park, CA vs Pittsboro, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Baldwin park, CA vs Pittsboro, MS.
| Data | Baldwin park | Pittsboro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,455 | 157 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 24.9 years |
| Median Income | $76,002 | $36,922 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.3 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Baldwin park vs Pittsboro
- In Baldwin park, the population is higher at 69,455, compared to 157 in Pittsboro.
- Residents in Baldwin park have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 24.9 years in Pittsboro.
- Baldwin park has a higher median income of $76,002 compared to $36,922 in Pittsboro.
- In Pittsboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 37.0% in Baldwin park.
- The poverty level is higher in Pittsboro at 13%, compared to 12% in Baldwin park.
- The unemployment rate in Baldwin park is higher at 6.3%, compared to 6.2% in Pittsboro.
Demographics
Demographics Baldwin park vs Pittsboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Baldwin park | Pittsboro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 40 |
| White | -25 | 14 |
| Asian | 23 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 75 | 44 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | 2 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Pittsboro
- In Pittsboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 1% in Baldwin park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pittsboro at 14% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
- The Asian population is larger in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 0% in Pittsboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Baldwin park at 75% compared to 44% in Pittsboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 2% in Pittsboro.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Baldwin park at 3% compared to 0% in Pittsboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Baldwin park | Pittsboro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 14.7% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 11.4% | 25.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 29.9% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Pittsboro
- In Pittsboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.4% in Baldwin park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pittsboro at 23.8% versus 14.7% in Baldwin park.
- Pittsboro has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Baldwin park and Pittsboro at 14.2%.
- Pittsboro has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pittsboro at 27.0% compared to 10.0% in Baldwin park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Baldwin park | Pittsboro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 5.5% (3,853) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.1% (12,587) | 19.7% (31) |
| Less than High School | 41.7% (28,939) | 20.4% (32) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (6,787) | 13.4% (21) |
Education Levels Comparison: Baldwin park vs Pittsboro
- A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.0% in Pittsboro.
- In Pittsboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.7% compared to 18.1% in Baldwin park.
- More residents in Baldwin park have less than a high school education at 41.7% compared to 20.4% in Pittsboro.
- In Pittsboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 9.8% in Baldwin park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.