Demographics details for Baldwin park, CA vs Livingston, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Baldwin park, CA vs Livingston, TX.

Data Baldwin park Livingston
Population 69,455 5,784
Median Age 37.1 years 36.9 years
Median Income $76,002 $47,952
Married Families 37.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level 12% 12%
Unemployment Rate 6.3 3.5

Population Comparison: Baldwin park vs Livingston

  • In Baldwin park, the population is higher at 69,455, compared to 5,784 in Livingston.
  • Residents in Baldwin park have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 36.9 years in Livingston.
  • Baldwin park has a higher median income of $76,002 compared to $47,952 in Livingston.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Baldwin park at 37.0% compared to 28.0% in Livingston.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Baldwin park and Livingston at 12%.
  • The unemployment rate in Baldwin park is higher at 6.3%, compared to 3.5% in Livingston.

Demographics

Demographics Baldwin park vs Livingston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Baldwin park Livingston
Black 1 18
White -25 38
Asian 23 2
Hispanic 75 29
Two or More Races 23 13
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Livingston

  • In Livingston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 1% in Baldwin park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Livingston at 38% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 2% in Livingston.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Baldwin park at 75% compared to 29% in Livingston.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 13% in Livingston.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Baldwin park at 3% compared to 0% in Livingston.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Baldwin park Livingston
Mental Health Not Good 15.4% 18.7%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% 13.1%
Depression 14.7% 24.1%
Smoking 11.4% 19.9%
Binge Drinking 14.2% 17.9%
Obesity 29.9% 42.1%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Livingston

  • In Livingston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.4% in Baldwin park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Livingston at 24.1% versus 14.7% in Baldwin park.
  • Livingston has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Livingston at 17.9% compared to 14.2% in Baldwin park.
  • Livingston has higher obesity rates at 42.1% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Livingston at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Baldwin park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Baldwin park Livingston
No Schooling 5.5% (3,853) 2.1% (123)
High School Diploma 18.1% (12,587) 20.7% (1,198)
Less than High School 41.7% (28,939) 22.3% (1,289)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.8% (6,787) 9.0% (518)

Education Levels Comparison: Baldwin park vs Livingston

  • A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 2.1% in Livingston.
  • In Livingston, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.7% compared to 18.1% in Baldwin park.
  • More residents in Baldwin park have less than a high school education at 41.7% compared to 22.3% in Livingston.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 9.0% in Livingston.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.