Demographics details for Baldwin park, CA vs Grove, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Baldwin park, CA vs Grove, OK.
| Data | Baldwin park | Grove |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 69,455 | 7,215 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 46.9 years |
| Median Income | $76,002 | $56,469 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Baldwin park vs Grove
- In Baldwin park, the population is higher at 69,455, compared to 7,215 in Grove.
- The median age in Grove is higher at 46.9 years, compared to 37.1 years in Baldwin park.
- Baldwin park has a higher median income of $76,002 compared to $56,469 in Grove.
- In Grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 37.0% in Baldwin park.
- Baldwin park has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Grove.
- The unemployment rate in Baldwin park is higher at 6.3%, compared to 3.5% in Grove.
Demographics
Demographics Baldwin park vs Grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Baldwin park | Grove |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | -25 | 70 |
| Asian | 23 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 75 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | 11 |
| American Indian | 3 | 11 |
Demographics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Grove
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Baldwin park and Grove at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grove at 70% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
- The Asian population is larger in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 0% in Grove.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Baldwin park at 75% compared to 7% in Grove.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 11% in Grove.
- In Grove, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 11%, compared to 3% in Baldwin park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Baldwin park | Grove |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 14.7% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 11.4% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 29.9% | 38.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Grove
- In Grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 15.4% in Baldwin park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grove at 25.4% versus 14.7% in Baldwin park.
- Grove has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grove at 15.1% compared to 14.2% in Baldwin park.
- Grove has higher obesity rates at 38.3% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grove at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Baldwin park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Baldwin park | Grove |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 5.5% (3,853) | 0.3% (20) |
| High School Diploma | 18.1% (12,587) | 14.8% (1,068) |
| Less than High School | 41.7% (28,939) | 11.5% (832) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (6,787) | 20.3% (1,463) |
Education Levels Comparison: Baldwin park vs Grove
- A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.3% in Grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park hold a high school diploma at 18.1% compared to 14.8% in Grove.
- More residents in Baldwin park have less than a high school education at 41.7% compared to 11.5% in Grove.
- In Grove, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.3% compared to 9.8% in Baldwin park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.