Demographics details for Baldwin park, CA vs Cummington, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Baldwin park, CA vs Cummington, MA.

Data Baldwin park Cummington
Population 69,455 878
Median Age 37.1 years 42.0 years
Median Income $76,002 $75,000
Married Families 37.0% 20.0%
Poverty Level 12% 5%
Unemployment Rate 6.3 4.3

Population Comparison: Baldwin park vs Cummington

  • In Baldwin park, the population is higher at 69,455, compared to 878 in Cummington.
  • The median age in Cummington is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 37.1 years in Baldwin park.
  • Baldwin park has a higher median income of $76,002 compared to $75,000 in Cummington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Baldwin park at 37.0% compared to 20.0% in Cummington.
  • Baldwin park has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Cummington.
  • The unemployment rate in Baldwin park is higher at 6.3%, compared to 4.3% in Cummington.

Demographics

Demographics Baldwin park vs Cummington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Baldwin park Cummington
Black 1 1
White -25 97
Asian 23 Data is updating
Hispanic 75 1
Two or More Races 23 1
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Cummington

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Baldwin park and Cummington at 1%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cummington at 97% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 0% in Cummington.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Baldwin park at 75% compared to 1% in Cummington.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 1% in Cummington.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Baldwin park at 3% compared to 0% in Cummington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Baldwin park Cummington
Mental Health Not Good 15.4% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% Data is updating%
Depression 14.7% Data is updating%
Smoking 11.4% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 14.2% Data is updating%
Obesity 29.9% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 10.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Cummington

  • More residents in Baldwin park report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Baldwin park at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Baldwin park at 11.4% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Baldwin park at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Baldwin park at 29.9% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Baldwin park at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Baldwin park Cummington
No Schooling 5.5% (3,853) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 18.1% (12,587) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 41.7% (28,939) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.8% (6,787) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Baldwin park vs Cummington

  • A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park hold a high school diploma at 18.1% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
  • More residents in Baldwin park have less than a high school education at 41.7% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 0.0% in Cummington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.