Demographics details for Baldwin park, CA vs Cambridge, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Baldwin park, CA vs Cambridge, OH.
Data | Baldwin park | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Population | 69,455 | 9,985 |
Median Age | 37.1 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $76,002 | $39,589 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.3 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Baldwin park vs Cambridge
- In Baldwin park, the population is higher at 69,455, compared to 9,985 in Cambridge.
- Residents in Baldwin park have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 35.1 years in Cambridge.
- Baldwin park has a higher median income of $76,002 compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Baldwin park at 37.0% compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
- The poverty level is higher in Cambridge at 16%, compared to 12% in Baldwin park.
- The unemployment rate in Baldwin park is higher at 6.3%, compared to 4.5% in Cambridge.
Demographics
Demographics Baldwin park vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Baldwin park | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 6 |
White | -25 | 88 |
Asian | 23 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 75 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 23 | 4 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Baldwin park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cambridge at 88% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
- The Asian population is larger in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Baldwin park at 75% compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 4% in Cambridge.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Baldwin park at 3% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Baldwin park | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 20.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 15.1% |
Depression | 14.7% | 25.9% |
Smoking | 11.4% | 26.2% |
Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 29.9% | 46.4% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 15.4% in Baldwin park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cambridge at 25.9% versus 14.7% in Baldwin park.
- Cambridge has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cambridge at 16.9% compared to 14.2% in Baldwin park.
- Cambridge has higher obesity rates at 46.4% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Baldwin park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Baldwin park | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 5.5% (3,853) | 0.7% (73) |
High School Diploma | 18.1% (12,587) | 25.1% (2,502) |
Less than High School | 41.7% (28,939) | 17.3% (1,732) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (6,787) | 8.8% (875) |
Education Levels Comparison: Baldwin park vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.7% in Cambridge.
- In Cambridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 18.1% in Baldwin park.
- More residents in Baldwin park have less than a high school education at 41.7% compared to 17.3% in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.