Demographics details for Baldwin park, CA vs Cambridge, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Baldwin park, CA vs Cambridge, OH.

Data Baldwin park Cambridge
Population 69,455 9,985
Median Age 37.1 years 35.1 years
Median Income $76,002 $39,589
Married Families 37.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level 12% 16%
Unemployment Rate 6.3 4.5

Population Comparison: Baldwin park vs Cambridge

  • In Baldwin park, the population is higher at 69,455, compared to 9,985 in Cambridge.
  • Residents in Baldwin park have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 35.1 years in Cambridge.
  • Baldwin park has a higher median income of $76,002 compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Baldwin park at 37.0% compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cambridge at 16%, compared to 12% in Baldwin park.
  • The unemployment rate in Baldwin park is higher at 6.3%, compared to 4.5% in Cambridge.

Demographics

Demographics Baldwin park vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Baldwin park Cambridge
Black 1 6
White -25 88
Asian 23 Data is updating
Hispanic 75 2
Two or More Races 23 4
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Cambridge

  • In Cambridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Baldwin park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cambridge at 88% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Baldwin park at 75% compared to 2% in Cambridge.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Baldwin park at 23% compared to 4% in Cambridge.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Baldwin park at 3% compared to 0% in Cambridge.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Baldwin park Cambridge
Mental Health Not Good 15.4% 20.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% 15.1%
Depression 14.7% 25.9%
Smoking 11.4% 26.2%
Binge Drinking 14.2% 16.9%
Obesity 29.9% 46.4%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Baldwin park vs Cambridge

  • In Cambridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 15.4% in Baldwin park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cambridge at 25.9% versus 14.7% in Baldwin park.
  • Cambridge has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cambridge at 16.9% compared to 14.2% in Baldwin park.
  • Cambridge has higher obesity rates at 46.4% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Baldwin park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Baldwin park Cambridge
No Schooling 5.5% (3,853) 0.7% (73)
High School Diploma 18.1% (12,587) 25.1% (2,502)
Less than High School 41.7% (28,939) 17.3% (1,732)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.8% (6,787) 8.8% (875)

Education Levels Comparison: Baldwin park vs Cambridge

  • A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.7% in Cambridge.
  • In Cambridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 18.1% in Baldwin park.
  • More residents in Baldwin park have less than a high school education at 41.7% compared to 17.3% in Cambridge.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Baldwin park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.