Demographics details for Bakersfield, CA vs Laurelville, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bakersfield, CA vs Laurelville, OH.

Data Bakersfield Laurelville
Population 410,647 506
Median Age 31.5 years 36.1 years
Median Income $73,827 $50,357
Married Families 34.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 21% 12%
Unemployment Rate 6.3 3.5

Population Comparison: Bakersfield vs Laurelville

  • In Bakersfield, the population is higher at 410,647, compared to 506 in Laurelville.
  • The median age in Laurelville is higher at 36.1 years, compared to 31.5 years in Bakersfield.
  • Bakersfield has a higher median income of $73,827 compared to $50,357 in Laurelville.
  • In Laurelville, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 34.0% in Bakersfield.
  • Bakersfield has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 12% in Laurelville.
  • The unemployment rate in Bakersfield is higher at 6.3%, compared to 3.5% in Laurelville.

Demographics

Demographics Bakersfield vs Laurelville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bakersfield Laurelville
Black 6 Data is updating
White 18 88
Asian 7 Data is updating
Hispanic 52 Data is updating
Two or More Races 16 12
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Bakersfield vs Laurelville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bakersfield at 6% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Laurelville at 88% compared to 18% in Bakersfield.
  • The Asian population is larger in Bakersfield at 7% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Bakersfield at 52% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Bakersfield at 16% compared to 12% in Laurelville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bakersfield at 1% compared to 0% in Laurelville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bakersfield Laurelville
Mental Health Not Good 17.5% 20.7%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 14.8%
Depression 19.5% 26.8%
Smoking 15.6% 27.9%
Binge Drinking 15.9% 17.0%
Obesity 35.2% 45.9%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bakersfield vs Laurelville

  • In Laurelville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 17.5% in Bakersfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Laurelville at 26.8% versus 19.5% in Bakersfield.
  • Laurelville has a higher smoking rate at 27.9% compared to 15.6% in Bakersfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Laurelville at 17.0% compared to 15.9% in Bakersfield.
  • Laurelville has higher obesity rates at 45.9% compared to 35.2% in Bakersfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laurelville at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Bakersfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bakersfield Laurelville
No Schooling 1.7% (6,851) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 13.0% (53,563) 41.5% (210)
Less than High School 20.5% (84,322) 18.2% (92)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.8% (56,741) 2.8% (14)

Education Levels Comparison: Bakersfield vs Laurelville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Bakersfield have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Laurelville.
  • In Laurelville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 41.5% compared to 13.0% in Bakersfield.
  • More residents in Bakersfield have less than a high school education at 20.5% compared to 18.2% in Laurelville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bakersfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.8% compared to 2.8% in Laurelville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.