Demographics details for Bakersfield, CA vs Ecru, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bakersfield, CA vs Ecru, MS.
| Data | Bakersfield | Ecru |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 410,647 | 919 |
| Median Age | 31.5 years | 24.8 years |
| Median Income | $73,827 | $52,350 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.3 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Bakersfield vs Ecru
- In Bakersfield, the population is higher at 410,647, compared to 919 in Ecru.
- Residents in Bakersfield have a higher median age of 31.5 years compared to 24.8 years in Ecru.
- Bakersfield has a higher median income of $73,827 compared to $52,350 in Ecru.
- In Ecru, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 34.0% in Bakersfield.
- Bakersfield has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 16% in Ecru.
- The unemployment rate in Bakersfield is higher at 6.3%, compared to 5.0% in Ecru.
Demographics
Demographics Bakersfield vs Ecru provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bakersfield | Ecru |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 44 |
| White | 18 | 25 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 52 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bakersfield vs Ecru
- In Ecru, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 44% compared to 6% in Bakersfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ecru at 25% compared to 18% in Bakersfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Bakersfield at 7% compared to 0% in Ecru.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bakersfield at 52% compared to 23% in Ecru.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bakersfield at 16% compared to 8% in Ecru.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bakersfield at 1% compared to 0% in Ecru.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bakersfield | Ecru |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 19.5% | 25.1% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bakersfield vs Ecru
- In Ecru, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.5% in Bakersfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ecru at 25.1% versus 19.5% in Bakersfield.
- Ecru has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 15.6% in Bakersfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bakersfield at 15.9% compared to 14.6% in Ecru.
- Ecru has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 35.2% in Bakersfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ecru at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Bakersfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bakersfield | Ecru |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (6,851) | 2.2% (20) |
| High School Diploma | 13.0% (53,563) | 15.5% (142) |
| Less than High School | 20.5% (84,322) | 31.1% (286) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.8% (56,741) | 14.8% (136) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bakersfield vs Ecru
- In Ecru, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.7% in Bakersfield.
- In Ecru, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.5% compared to 13.0% in Bakersfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ecru at 31.1%, compared to 20.5% in Bakersfield.
- In Ecru, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 13.8% in Bakersfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.