Demographics details for Azusa, CA vs New haven, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Azusa, CA vs New haven, CT.
| Data | Azusa | New haven |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,824 | 138,915 |
| Median Age | 32.8 years | 31.0 years |
| Median Income | $81,516 | $54,305 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 21.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Azusa vs New haven
- The population in New haven is higher at 138,915, compared to 48,824 in Azusa.
- Residents in Azusa have a higher median age of 32.8 years compared to 31.0 years in New haven.
- Azusa has a higher median income of $81,516 compared to $54,305 in New haven.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Azusa at 32.0% compared to 21.0% in New haven.
- The poverty level is higher in New haven at 19%, compared to 12% in Azusa.
- The unemployment rate in Azusa is higher at 6.3%, compared to 3.5% in New haven.
Demographics
Demographics Azusa vs New haven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Azusa | New haven |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 29 |
| White | -6 | 27 |
| Asian | 16 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 66 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 20 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Azusa vs New haven
- In New haven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 3% in Azusa.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New haven at 27% compared to -6% in Azusa.
- The Asian population is larger in Azusa at 16% compared to 5% in New haven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Azusa at 66% compared to 30% in New haven.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Azusa at 20% compared to 9% in New haven.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Azusa at 1% compared to 0% in New haven.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Azusa | New haven |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 15.9% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 11.0% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 13.0% |
| Obesity | 30.3% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Azusa vs New haven
- In New haven, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.6% in Azusa.
- Higher depression rates are seen in New haven at 19.8% versus 15.9% in Azusa.
- New haven has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 11.0% in Azusa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Azusa at 15.1% compared to 13.0% in New haven.
- New haven has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 30.3% in Azusa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New haven at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Azusa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Azusa | New haven |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (1,200) | 1.2% (1,674) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (6,920) | 15.7% (21,744) |
| Less than High School | 25.2% (12,281) | 15.1% (20,913) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (8,417) | 23.5% (32,679) |
Education Levels Comparison: Azusa vs New haven
- A higher percentage of residents in Azusa have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.2% in New haven.
- In New haven, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.7% compared to 14.2% in Azusa.
- More residents in Azusa have less than a high school education at 25.2% compared to 15.1% in New haven.
- In New haven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.5% compared to 17.2% in Azusa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.