Demographics details for Azusa, CA vs Jeffersonville, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Azusa, CA vs Jeffersonville, IN.
| Data | Azusa | Jeffersonville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,824 | 51,030 |
| Median Age | 32.8 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $81,516 | $67,566 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.3 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Azusa vs Jeffersonville
- The population in Jeffersonville is higher at 51,030, compared to 48,824 in Azusa.
- The median age in Jeffersonville is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 32.8 years in Azusa.
- Azusa has a higher median income of $81,516 compared to $67,566 in Jeffersonville.
- In Jeffersonville, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in Azusa.
- Azusa has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Jeffersonville.
- The unemployment rate in Azusa is higher at 6.3%, compared to 4.1% in Jeffersonville.
Demographics
Demographics Azusa vs Jeffersonville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Azusa | Jeffersonville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 12 |
| White | -6 | 75 |
| Asian | 16 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 66 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 20 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Azusa vs Jeffersonville
- In Jeffersonville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 3% in Azusa.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jeffersonville at 75% compared to -6% in Azusa.
- The Asian population is larger in Azusa at 16% compared to 1% in Jeffersonville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Azusa at 66% compared to 5% in Jeffersonville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Azusa at 20% compared to 7% in Jeffersonville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Azusa at 1% compared to 0% in Jeffersonville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Azusa | Jeffersonville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 15.9% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 11.0% | 20.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 30.3% | 40.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Azusa vs Jeffersonville
- In Jeffersonville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.6% in Azusa.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Jeffersonville at 23.5% versus 15.9% in Azusa.
- Jeffersonville has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 11.0% in Azusa.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jeffersonville at 16.9% compared to 15.1% in Azusa.
- Jeffersonville has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 30.3% in Azusa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jeffersonville at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Azusa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Azusa | Jeffersonville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (1,200) | 0.6% (293) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (6,920) | 18.6% (9,472) |
| Less than High School | 25.2% (12,281) | 9.7% (4,952) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (8,417) | 16.9% (8,649) |
Education Levels Comparison: Azusa vs Jeffersonville
- A higher percentage of residents in Azusa have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.6% in Jeffersonville.
- In Jeffersonville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 14.2% in Azusa.
- More residents in Azusa have less than a high school education at 25.2% compared to 9.7% in Jeffersonville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Azusa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 16.9% in Jeffersonville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.