Demographics details for Azusa, CA vs Interlachen, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Azusa, CA vs Interlachen, FL.
| Data | Azusa | Interlachen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,824 | 1,457 |
| Median Age | 32.8 years | 48.6 years |
| Median Income | $81,516 | $50,776 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.3 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Azusa vs Interlachen
- In Azusa, the population is higher at 48,824, compared to 1,457 in Interlachen.
- The median age in Interlachen is higher at 48.6 years, compared to 32.8 years in Azusa.
- Azusa has a higher median income of $81,516 compared to $50,776 in Interlachen.
- In Interlachen, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 32.0% in Azusa.
- The poverty level is identical in both Azusa and Interlachen at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Azusa is higher at 6.3%, compared to 4.5% in Interlachen.
Demographics
Demographics Azusa vs Interlachen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Azusa | Interlachen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 11 |
| White | -6 | 37 |
| Asian | 16 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 66 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 20 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Azusa vs Interlachen
- In Interlachen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 3% in Azusa.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Interlachen at 37% compared to -6% in Azusa.
- The Asian population is larger in Azusa at 16% compared to 0% in Interlachen.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Azusa at 66% compared to 34% in Interlachen.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Azusa at 20% compared to 18% in Interlachen.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Azusa at 1% compared to 0% in Interlachen.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Azusa | Interlachen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 15.9% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 11.0% | 24.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 30.3% | 35.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Azusa vs Interlachen
- In Interlachen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.6% in Azusa.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Interlachen at 20.3% versus 15.9% in Azusa.
- Interlachen has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 11.0% in Azusa.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Interlachen at 16.7% compared to 15.1% in Azusa.
- Interlachen has higher obesity rates at 35.5% compared to 30.3% in Azusa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Interlachen at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Azusa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Azusa | Interlachen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (1,200) | 2.0% (29) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (6,920) | 22.0% (320) |
| Less than High School | 25.2% (12,281) | 41.7% (607) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (8,417) | 10.4% (151) |
Education Levels Comparison: Azusa vs Interlachen
- A higher percentage of residents in Azusa have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 2.0% in Interlachen.
- In Interlachen, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 14.2% in Azusa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Interlachen at 41.7%, compared to 25.2% in Azusa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Azusa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 10.4% in Interlachen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.