Demographics details for Avon lake, OH vs Schoharie, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Avon lake, OH vs Schoharie, NY.
Data | Avon lake | Schoharie |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,617 | 30,063 |
Median Age | 45.2 years | 45.7 years |
Median Income | $103,946 | $71,479 |
Married Families | 49.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Avon lake vs Schoharie
- The population in Schoharie is higher at 30,063, compared to 25,617 in Avon lake.
- The median age in Schoharie is higher at 45.7 years, compared to 45.2 years in Avon lake.
- Avon lake has a higher median income of $103,946 compared to $71,479 in Schoharie.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Avon lake at 49.0% compared to 43.0% in Schoharie.
- The poverty level is higher in Schoharie at 7%, compared to 0% in Avon lake.
- The unemployment rate in Avon lake is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.9% in Schoharie.
Demographics
Demographics Avon lake vs Schoharie provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Avon lake | Schoharie |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 2 |
White | 91 | 89 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Avon lake vs Schoharie
- In Schoharie, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Avon lake.
- Avon lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 89% in Schoharie.
- The Asian population is larger in Avon lake at 3% compared to 1% in Schoharie.
- Schoharie has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Avon lake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Schoharie at 4%, compared to 3% in Avon lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Avon lake and Schoharie at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Avon lake | Schoharie |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | 11.1% |
Depression | 21.3% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 13.6% | 18.9% |
Binge Drinking | 21.0% | 19.0% |
Obesity | 32.4% | 37.0% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Avon lake vs Schoharie
- In Schoharie, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 14.4% in Avon lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Schoharie at 23.3% versus 21.3% in Avon lake.
- Schoharie has a higher smoking rate at 18.9% compared to 13.6% in Avon lake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Avon lake at 21.0% compared to 19.0% in Schoharie.
- Schoharie has higher obesity rates at 37.0% compared to 32.4% in Avon lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Schoharie at 17.0% compared to 8.0% in Avon lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Avon lake | Schoharie |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (84) | 0.8% (242) |
High School Diploma | 10.7% (2,732) | 20.8% (6,267) |
Less than High School | 2.8% (722) | 12.3% (3,707) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.3% (9,818) | 17.9% (5,369) |
Education Levels Comparison: Avon lake vs Schoharie
- In Schoharie, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Avon lake.
- In Schoharie, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 10.7% in Avon lake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Schoharie at 12.3%, compared to 2.8% in Avon lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Avon lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.3% compared to 17.9% in Schoharie.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.