Demographics details for Avon lake, OH vs Fifield, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Avon lake, OH vs Fifield, WI.
Data | Avon lake | Fifield |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,617 | 879 |
Median Age | 45.2 years | 50.0 years |
Median Income | $103,946 | $50,000 |
Married Families | 49.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Avon lake vs Fifield
- In Avon lake, the population is higher at 25,617, compared to 879 in Fifield.
- The median age in Fifield is higher at 50.0 years, compared to 45.2 years in Avon lake.
- Avon lake has a higher median income of $103,946 compared to $50,000 in Fifield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Avon lake at 49.0% compared to 20.0% in Fifield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fifield at 10%, compared to 0% in Avon lake.
- Fifield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.0% in Avon lake.
Demographics
Demographics Avon lake vs Fifield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Avon lake | Fifield |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 91 | 100 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Avon lake vs Fifield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Avon lake at 1% compared to 0% in Fifield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fifield at 100% compared to 91% in Avon lake.
- The Asian population is larger in Avon lake at 3% compared to 0% in Fifield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Avon lake at 2% compared to 0% in Fifield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Avon lake at 3% compared to 0% in Fifield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Avon lake and Fifield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Avon lake | Fifield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.8% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 21.3% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 13.6% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 21.0% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 32.4% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Avon lake vs Fifield
- More residents in Avon lake report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Avon lake at 21.3% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Avon lake at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Avon lake at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Avon lake at 32.4% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Avon lake at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Avon lake | Fifield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (84) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 10.7% (2,732) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 2.8% (722) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.3% (9,818) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Avon lake vs Fifield
- A higher percentage of residents in Avon lake have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Avon lake hold a high school diploma at 10.7% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- More residents in Avon lake have less than a high school education at 2.8% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Avon lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.3% compared to 0.0% in Fifield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.