Demographics details for Avon by the sea, NJ vs Douglas, NE

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Avon by the sea, NJ vs Douglas, NE.

Data Avon by the sea Douglas
Population 1,940 171
Median Age 56.2 years 33.4 years
Median Income $106,563 $65,000
Married Families 44.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.2 2.5

Population Comparison: Avon by the sea vs Douglas

  • In Avon by the sea, the population is higher at 1,940, compared to 171 in Douglas.
  • Residents in Avon by the sea have a higher median age of 56.2 years compared to 33.4 years in Douglas.
  • Avon by the sea has a higher median income of $106,563 compared to $65,000 in Douglas.
  • In Douglas, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 44.0% in Avon by the sea.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Avon by the sea and Douglas at 0%.
  • The unemployment rate in Avon by the sea is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.5% in Douglas.

Demographics

Demographics Avon by the sea vs Douglas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Avon by the sea Douglas
Black 1 Data is updating
White 88 97
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 6 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Avon by the sea vs Douglas

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Avon by the sea at 1% compared to 0% in Douglas.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Douglas at 97% compared to 88% in Avon by the sea.
  • Both Avon by the sea and Douglas have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Avon by the sea at 6% compared to 0% in Douglas.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Avon by the sea at 4% compared to 2% in Douglas.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Avon by the sea and Douglas at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Avon by the sea Douglas
Mental Health Not Good 13.7% 12.7%
Physical Health Not Good 7.7% 8.3%
Depression 20.3% 18.5%
Smoking 9.9% 13.6%
Binge Drinking 19.5% 23.1%
Obesity 25.6% 36.8%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Avon by the sea vs Douglas

  • More residents in Avon by the sea report poor mental health at 13.7% compared to 12.7% in Douglas.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Avon by the sea at 20.3% compared to 18.5% in Douglas.
  • Douglas has a higher smoking rate at 13.6% compared to 9.9% in Avon by the sea.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Douglas at 23.1% compared to 19.5% in Avon by the sea.
  • Douglas has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 25.6% in Avon by the sea.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Douglas at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Avon by the sea.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Avon by the sea Douglas
No Schooling 0.3% (6) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 9.7% (188) 10.5% (18)
Less than High School 3.5% (67) 38.6% (66)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 52.3% (1,014) 11.1% (19)

Education Levels Comparison: Avon by the sea vs Douglas

  • A higher percentage of residents in Avon by the sea have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Douglas.
  • In Douglas, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.5% compared to 9.7% in Avon by the sea.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Douglas at 38.6%, compared to 3.5% in Avon by the sea.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Avon by the sea hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.3% compared to 11.1% in Douglas.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.