Demographics details for Averill park, NY vs Washington, LA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Averill park, NY vs Washington, LA.

Data Averill park Washington
Population 1,608 726
Median Age 53.3 years 26.6 years
Median Income $109,746 $36,719
Married Families 50.0% 23.0%
Poverty Level 4% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.2

Population Comparison: Averill park vs Washington

  • In Averill park, the population is higher at 1,608, compared to 726 in Washington.
  • Residents in Averill park have a higher median age of 53.3 years compared to 26.6 years in Washington.
  • Averill park has a higher median income of $109,746 compared to $36,719 in Washington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Averill park at 50.0% compared to 23.0% in Washington.
  • The poverty level is higher in Washington at 15%, compared to 4% in Averill park.
  • Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Averill park.

Demographics

Demographics Averill park vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Averill park Washington
Black Data is updating 65
White 100 20
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 3
Two or More Races Data is updating 12
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Averill park vs Washington

  • In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 65% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • Averill park has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 20% in Washington.
  • Both Averill park and Washington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Washington at 12%, compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Averill park and Washington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Averill park Washington
Mental Health Not Good 14.6% 21.1%
Physical Health Not Good 9.1% 15.3%
Depression 23.7% 25.5%
Smoking 15.9% 26.0%
Binge Drinking 21.5% 15.1%
Obesity 34.6% 41.5%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Averill park vs Washington

  • In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 14.6% in Averill park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 25.5% versus 23.7% in Averill park.
  • Washington has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 15.9% in Averill park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 15.1% in Washington.
  • Washington has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 34.6% in Averill park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Averill park at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Washington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Averill park Washington
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 22.0% (354) 20.2% (147)
Less than High School 3.7% (60) 27.7% (201)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 32.3% (520) 7.3% (53)

Education Levels Comparison: Averill park vs Washington

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Averill park and Washington at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Averill park hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 20.2% in Washington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 27.7%, compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Averill park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 7.3% in Washington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.