Demographics details for Averill park, NY vs Milford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Averill park, NY vs Milford, CT.
Data | Averill park | Milford |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,608 | 50,471 |
Median Age | 53.3 years | 46.6 years |
Median Income | $109,746 | $104,503 |
Married Families | 50.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Averill park vs Milford
- The population in Milford is higher at 50,471, compared to 1,608 in Averill park.
- Residents in Averill park have a higher median age of 53.3 years compared to 46.6 years in Milford.
- Averill park has a higher median income of $109,746 compared to $104,503 in Milford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Averill park at 50.0% compared to 45.0% in Milford.
- The poverty level is higher in Milford at 5%, compared to 4% in Averill park.
- Milford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Averill park.
Demographics
Demographics Averill park vs Milford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Averill park | Milford |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 2 |
White | 100 | 79 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Averill park vs Milford
- In Milford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- Averill park has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 79% in Milford.
- In Milford, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Averill park.
- Milford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Averill park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Milford at 6%, compared to 0% in Averill park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Averill park and Milford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Averill park | Milford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 13.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 7.9% |
Depression | 23.7% | 20.5% |
Smoking | 15.9% | 12.7% |
Binge Drinking | 21.5% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 34.6% | 27.5% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Averill park vs Milford
- More residents in Averill park report poor mental health at 14.6% compared to 13.2% in Milford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Averill park at 23.7% compared to 20.5% in Milford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Averill park at 15.9% compared to 12.7% in Milford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 17.0% in Milford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Averill park at 34.6% compared to 27.5% in Milford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Averill park at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Milford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Averill park | Milford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (366) |
High School Diploma | 22.0% (354) | 16.7% (8,431) |
Less than High School | 3.7% (60) | 6.6% (3,307) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.3% (520) | 36.0% (18,184) |
Education Levels Comparison: Averill park vs Milford
- In Milford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Averill park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Averill park hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 16.7% in Milford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Milford at 6.6%, compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
- In Milford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 32.3% in Averill park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.